Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28368040›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2017

DOSCATs: Double standards for protein quantification.

Richard J Bennett, Deborah M Simpson, Stephen W Holman, Sheila Ryan, Philip Brownridge, Claire E Eyers, John Colyer, Robert J Beynon

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 31% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Absolute quantification of fluorescent protein fusions by mass spectrometry.Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Richard J BennettCentre for Proteome Research, Institute of Integrative Biology, Biosciences Building, University of Liverpool, Liverpool L69 7ZB, UK.
Deborah M SimpsonCentre for Proteome Research, Institute of Integrative Biology, Biosciences Building, University of Liverpool, Liverpool L69 7ZB, UK.
Stephen W HolmanCentre for Proteome Research, Institute of Integrative Biology, Biosciences Building, University of Liverpool, Liverpool L69 7ZB, UK.
Sheila RyanInstitute of Ageing and Chronic Disease, The Apex Building, 6 West Derby St., Liverpool L7 8TX, UK.
Philip BrownridgeCentre for Proteome Research, Institute of Integrative Biology, Biosciences Building, University of Liverpool, Liverpool L69 7ZB, UK.
Claire E EyersCentre for Proteome Research, Institute of Integrative Biology, Biosciences Building, University of Liverpool, Liverpool L69 7ZB, UK.
John ColyerBadrilla Ltd. Leeds Innovation Centre, School of Biomedical Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds LS2 9JT, UK.
Robert J BeynonCentre for Proteome Research, Institute of Integrative Biology, Biosciences Building, University of Liverpool, Liverpool L69 7ZB, UK.
University of Liverpool · GBUniversity of Leeds · GB

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/J012874/1Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/L009501/1Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/M018725/1Medical Research Council MR/M009114/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The two most common techniques for absolute protein quantification are based on either mass spectrometry (MS) or on immunochemical techniques, such as western blotting (WB). Western blotting is most often used for protein identification or relative quantification, but can also be deployed for absolute quantification if appropriate calibration standards are used. MS based techniques offer superior data quality and reproducibility, but WB offers greater sensitivity and accessibility to most researchers. It would be advantageous to apply both techniques for orthogonal quantification, but workflows rarely overlap. We describe DOSCATs (DOuble Standard conCATamers), novel calibration standards based on QconCAT technology, to unite these platforms. DOSCATs combine a series of epitope sequences concatenated with tryptic peptides in a single artificial protein to create internal tryptic peptide standards for MS as well as an intact protein bearing multiple linear epitopes. A DOSCAT protein was designed and constructed to quantify five proteins of the NF-κB pathway. For three target proteins, protein fold change and absolute copy per cell values measured by MS and WB were in excellent agreement. This demonstrates that DOSCATs can be used as multiplexed, dual purpose standards, readily deployed in a single workflow, supporting seamless quantitative transition from MS to WB.

Indexed as

HumansPeptide FragmentsProteinsProteomeProteomicsReference StandardsPeptide FragmentsProteinsProteome

Identifiers

PMID28368040
PMCPMC5377311
OpenAlexW2604950247

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.