Longitudinal Assessment of Dentate Nuclei Relaxometry during Massive Gadobutrol Exposure.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

1. Ten years of gadolinium retention and deposition: ESMRMB-GREC looks backward and forward.European radiology · 2024
   Review
2. Visible T1-hyperintensity of the dentate nucleus after multiple administrations of macrocyclic gadolinium-based contrast agents: yes or no?Insights into imaging · 2019
   Article
3. Cumulative gadodiamide administration leads to brain gadolinium deposition in early MS.Neurology · 2019
   Article
4. Standardized assessment of the signal intensity increase on unenhanced T1-weighted images in the brain: the European Gadolinium Retention Evaluation Consortium (GREC) Task Force position statement.European radiology · 2019
   Review
5. A Review of the Current Evidence on Gadolinium Deposition in the Brain.Clinical neuroradiology · 2018
   Review
6. Gadolinium retention in the body: what we know and what we can do.La Radiologia medica · 2017
   Review
7. RESUME: Turning an SWI acquisition into a fast qMRI protocol.PloS one · 2017
   Article

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

Abstract

Indexed as