Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28367676›Full record

ArticleJournal of biological rhythms2017

Are Individual Differences in Sleep and Circadian Timing Amplified by Use of Artificial Light Sources?

Krithika Swaminathan, Elizabeth B Klerman, Andrew J K Phillips

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of biological rhythms, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 44 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Actigraphy-measured rest-activity circadian rhythm disruption in patients with advanced cancer: a scoping review.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2021
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Sleep and circadian instability in delayed sleep-wake phase disorder.Journal of clinical sleep medicine : JCSM : official publication of the American Academy of Sleep Medicine · 2020
    Article
  19. Integrating wearable data into circadian models.Current opinion in systems biology · 2020
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Krithika SwaminathanDivision of Sleep and Circadian Disorders, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Elizabeth B KlermanDivision of Sleep and Circadian Disorders, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Andrew J K PhillipsDivision of Sleep and Circadian Disorders, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Brigham and Women's Hospital · USCircadian (United States) · US

Funding

TRANSPLANTATION ANALYSIS OF CIRCADIAN RHYTHMS AND AGINGP01AG009975 · NIA · BRIGHAM AND WOMEN'S HOSPITAL · PI CZEISLER, CHARLES A · 1991 to 2018
$23.1M
Influence of sleep regularity on circadian rhythms, learning, performance, and moodR01HL128538 · NHLBI · BRIGHAM AND WOMEN'S HOSPITAL · PI KLERMAN, ELIZABETH B. · 2016 to 2019
$3.6M
Sleep duration required to restore performance during chronic sleep restrictionR01HL114088 · NHLBI · BRIGHAM AND WOMEN'S HOSPITAL · PI KLERMAN, ELIZABETH B. · 2012 to 2015
$3.1M
Multi-scale modeling of sleep behaviors in social networksR01GM105018 · NIGMS · BRIGHAM AND WOMEN'S HOSPITAL · PI CZEISLER, CHARLES A, KLERMAN, ELIZABETH B. · 2013 to 2017
$2.4M
Sleep Duration Required to Restore Performance during Chronic Sleep RestrictionK24HL105664 · NHLBI · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI KLERMAN, ELIZABETH B. · 2010 to 2019
$1.8M
Human circadian sensitivity to very short light pulsesRC2HL101340 · NHLBI · BRIGHAM AND WOMEN'S HOSPITAL · PI KLERMAN, ELIZABETH B. · 2009 to 2010
$1.3M
Integration of sleep/wake network models across multiple temporal and spatial scaR00HL119618 · NHLBI · BRIGHAM AND WOMEN'S HOSPITAL · PI PHILLIPS, ANDREW JOHN · 2015 to 2017
$742k
Effects of Light and Melatonin on Contractions in Pregnant WomenR21HD086392 · NICHD · BRIGHAM AND WOMEN'S HOSPITAL · PI KLERMAN, ELIZABETH B. · 2016 to 2017
$488k
Integration of sleep/wake network models across multiple temporal and spatial scaK99HL119618 · NHLBI · BRIGHAM AND WOMEN'S HOSPITAL · PI PHILLIPS, ANDREW JOHN · 2013 to 2014
$177k
NHLBI NIH HHS K24 HL105664NHLBI NIH HHS K99 HL119618NHLBI NIH HHS R00 HL119618NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL114088NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL128538NHLBI NIH HHS RC2 HL101340NIA NIH HHS P01 AG009975NICHD NIH HHS R21 HD086392NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM105018
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Within the human population, there is large interindividual variability in the timing of sleep and circadian rhythms. This variability has been attributed to individual differences in sleep physiology, circadian physiology, and/or light exposure. Recent experimental evidence suggests that the latter is necessary to evoke large interindividual differences in sleep and circadian timing. We used a validated model of human sleep and circadian physiology to test the hypothesis that intrinsic differences in sleep and circadian timing are amplified by self-selected use of artificial light sources. We tested the model under 2 conditions motivated by an experimental study (Wright et al., 2013): (1) a "natural" light cycle, and (2) a "realistic" light cycle that included attenuation of light due to living indoors when natural light levels are high and use of electric light when natural light levels are low. Within these conditions, we determined the relationship between intrinsic circadian period (within the range of 23.7-24.6 h) and timing of sleep onset, sleep offset, and circadian rhythms. In addition, we simulated a work week, with fixed wake time for 5 days and free sleep times on weekends. Under both conditions, a longer intrinsic period resulted in later sleep and circadian timing. Compared to the natural condition, the realistic condition evoked more than double the variation in sleep timing across the physiological range of intrinsic circadian periods. Model predictions closely matched data from the experimental study. We found that if the intrinsic circadian period was long (>24.2 h) under the realistic condition, there was significant mismatch in sleep timing between weekdays and weekends, which is known as social jetlag. These findings indicate that individual tendencies to have very delayed schedules can be greatly amplified by self-selected modifications to the natural light/dark cycle. This has important implications for therapeutic treatment of advanced or delayed sleep phase disorders.

Indexed as

Circadian RhythmIndividualityLightingSleepBiological ClocksBody TemperatureHumansJet Lag SyndromeModels, TheoreticalPhotoperiodWakefulnesscircadian rhythmslight exposuremathematical modelingself-selectionsleep-wake timingsocial jetlag

Identifiers

PMID28367676
PMCPMC5593073
OpenAlexW2604559293

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.