Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28367497›Full record

ArticleCognitive research: principles and implications2017

The effect of abstract versus concrete framing on judgments of biological and psychological bases of behavior.

Nancy S Kim, Samuel G B Johnson, Woo-Kyoung Ahn, Joshua Knobe

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cognitive research: principles and implications, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Nancy S KimDepartment of Psychology, Northeastern University, 125 Nightingale Hall, 360 Huntington Avenue, Boston, MA 02115 USA.
Samuel G B JohnsonDepartment of Psychology, Yale University, Box 208205, New Haven, CT 06520-8205 USA.
Woo-Kyoung AhnDepartment of Psychology, Yale University, Box 208205, New Haven, CT 06520-8205 USA.
Joshua KnobeDepartment of Philosophy, Yale University, 344 College Street, New Haven, CT 06511 USA.
Yale University · USNortheastern University · US

Funding

EFFECTS OF CAUSAL BACKGROUND KNOWLEDGE ON CATEGORIZATIONR01MH057737 · NIMH · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI AHN, WOO-KYOUNG · 1998 to 2010
$2.2M
Understanding/Promoting Mental Health Literacy Based on Biological ExplanationsR01HG007653 · NHGRI · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI AHN, WOO-KYOUNG · 2013 to 2014
$824k
NHGRI NIH HHS R01 HG007653NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH057737
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Human behavior is frequently described both in abstract, general terms and in concrete, specific terms. We asked whether these two ways of framing equivalent behaviors shift the inferences people make about the biological and psychological bases of those behaviors. In five experiments, we manipulated whether behaviors are presented concretely (i.e. with reference to a specific person, instantiated in the particular context of that person's life) or abstractly (i.e. with reference to a category of people or behaviors across generalized contexts). People judged concretely framed behaviors to be less biologically based and, on some dimensions, more psychologically based than the same behaviors framed in the abstract. These findings held true for both mental disorders (Experiments 1 and 2) and everyday behaviors (Experiments 4 and 5), and yielded downstream consequences for the perceived efficacy of disorder treatments (Experiment 3). Implications for science educators, students of science, and members of the lay public are discussed.

Indexed as

Causal attributionExplanationFraming effectPerson perceptionScience education

Identifiers

PMID28367497
PMCPMC5357666
OpenAlexW2591520099

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.