Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28367415›Full record

ArticleCell journal

Effects of Electromagnetic Stimulation on Gene Expression of Mesenchymal Stem Cells and Repair of Bone Lesions.

Maryam Jazayeri, Mohammad Ali Shokrgozar, Nooshin Haghighipour, Bahram Bolouri, Fereshteh Mirahmadi, Mehdi Farokhi

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cell journal. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Synergistic effect of electromagnetic fields and nanomagnetic particles on osteogenesis through calcium channels and p-ERK signaling.Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society · 2021
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Biophysical Stimuli as the Fourth Pillar of Bone Tissue Engineering.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2021
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. The Effects of a Pulsed Electromagnetic Field on the Proliferation and Osteogenic Differentiation of Human Adipose-Derived Stem Cells.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2018
    Article
  15. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Maryam JazayeriNational Cell Bank of Iran, Pasteur Institute of Iran, Tehran, Iran.
Mohammad Ali ShokrgozarNational Cell Bank of Iran, Pasteur Institute of Iran, Tehran, Iran.
Nooshin HaghighipourNational Cell Bank of Iran, Pasteur Institute of Iran, Tehran, Iran.
Bahram BolouriDepartment of Biophysics and Medical Physics, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Fereshteh MirahmadiNational Cell Bank of Iran, Pasteur Institute of Iran, Tehran, Iran.
Mehdi FarokhiNational Cell Bank of Iran, Pasteur Institute of Iran, Tehran, Iran.
Pasteur Institute of Iran · IR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveMost people experience bone damage and bone disorders during their lifetimes. The use of autografts is a suitable way for injury recovery and healing. Mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) are key players in tissue engineering and regenerative medicine. Their proliferation potential and multipotent differentiation ability enable MSCs to be considered as appropriate cells for therapy and clinical applications. Differentiation of stem cells depends on their microenvironment and biophysical stimulations. The aim of this study is to analyze the effects of an electromagnetic field on osteogenic differentiation of stem cells. MATERIALS AND

methodsIn this experimental animal study, we assessed the effects of the essential parameters of a pulsatile electromagnetic field on osteogenic differentiation. The main purpose was to identify an optimum electromagnetic field for osteogenesis induction. After isolating MSCs from male Wistar rats, passage-3 (P3) cells were exposed to an electromagnetic field that had an intensity of 0.2 millitesla (mT) and frequency of 15 Hz for 10 days. Flow cytometry analysis confirmed the mesenchymal identity of the isolated cells. Pulsatile electromagnetic field-stimulated cells were examined by immunocytochemistry and real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR).

resultsElectromagnetic field stimulation alone motivated the expression of osteogenic genes. This stimulation was more effective when combined with osteogenic differentiation medium 6 hours per day for 10 days. For the

conclusionWe have shown that the combined use of chemical factors and an electromagnetic field was more effective for inducing osteogenesis. These elements have synergistic effects and are beneficial for bone tissue engineering applications.

Indexed as

DifferentiationGene ExpressionMesenchymal Stem CellOsteocalcin

Identifiers

PMID28367415
PMCPMC5241516
OpenAlexW2626247183

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.