Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28367410›Full record

ArticleNeuroepigenetics2017

Contrasting roles for DNA methyltransferases and histone deacetylases in single-item and associative recognition memory.

Hannah Scott, Anna E Smith, Gareth R Barker, James B Uney, E Clea Warburton

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neuroepigenetics, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Epigenetic Advances in Behavioral and Brain Sciences have Relevance for Public Policy.Policy insights from the behavioral and brain sciences · 2017
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Hannah ScottSchool of Physiology, Pharmacology and Neuroscience, University of Bristol, Bristol BS8 1TD, UK.
Anna E SmithSchool of Physiology, Pharmacology and Neuroscience, University of Bristol, Bristol BS8 1TD, UK.
Gareth R BarkerSchool of Physiology, Pharmacology and Neuroscience, University of Bristol, Bristol BS8 1TD, UK.
James B UneySchool of Clinical Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol BS8 1TD, UK.
E Clea WarburtonSchool of Physiology, Pharmacology and Neuroscience, University of Bristol, Bristol BS8 1TD, UK.
University of Bristol · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recognition memory enables us to judge whether we have encountered a stimulus before and to recall associated information, including where the stimulus was encountered. The perirhinal cortex (PRh) is required for judgment of stimulus familiarity, while hippocampus (HPC) and medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC) are additionally involved when spatial information associated with a stimulus needs to be remembered. While gene expression is known to be essential for the consolidation of long-term recognition memory, the underlying regulatory mechanisms are not fully understood. Here we investigated the roles of two epigenetic mechanisms, DNA methylation and histone deacetylation, in recognition memory. Infusion of DNA methyltransferase inhibitors into PRh impaired performance in novel object recognition and object-in-place tasks while infusions into HPC or mPFC impaired object-in-place performance only. In contrast, inhibition of histone deacetylases in PRh, but not mPFC, enhanced recognition memory. These results support the emerging role of epigenetic processes in learning and memory.

Indexed as

DNMTHDACHippocampusPerirhinal cortexPrefrontal cortexRecognition memory

Identifiers

PMID28367410
PMCPMC5364272
OpenAlexW2592498240

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.