ArticlePeerJ2017
SLIMM: species level identification of microorganisms from metagenomes.
Article in PeerJ, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed.
- Clinical metagenomics for diagnosis and surveillance of viral pathogens.Nature reviews. Microbiology · 2026Review
- Fast and space-efficient taxonomic classification of long reads with hierarchical interleaved XOR filters.Genome research · 2024Article
- KMCP: accurate metagenomic profiling of both prokaryotic and viral populations by pseudo-mapping.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2023Article
- Article
- PathoLive-Real-Time Pathogen Identification from Metagenomic Illumina Datasets.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Gut Microbial Signatures of Distinct Trimethylamine N-Oxide Response to Raspberry Consumption.Nutrients · 2022Article
- Analysis of oral microbial dysbiosis associated with early childhood caries.BMC oral health · 2021Article
- A big data approach to metagenomics for all-food-sequencing.BMC bioinformatics · 2020Article
- MICOM: Metagenome-Scale Modeling To Infer Metabolic Interactions in the Gut Microbiota.mSystems · 2020Article
- The gut microbiome of horses: current research on equine enteral microbiota and future perspectives.Animal microbiome · 2019Review
- Resolving Phylogenetic Relationships for Streptococcus mitis and Streptococcus oralis through Core- and Pan-Genome Analyses.Genome biology and evolution · 2019Article
- Simultaneous profiling of sexually transmitted bacterial pathogens, microbiome, and concordant host response in cervical samples using whole transcriptome sequencing analysis.Microbial cell (Graz, Austria) · 2019Article
- KrakenUniq: confident and fast metagenomics classification using unique k-mer counts.Genome biology · 2018Article
- Species classifier choice is a key consideration when analysing low-complexity food microbiome data.Microbiome · 2018Article
- Identification of fungi in shotgun metagenomics datasets.PloS one · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Identification and quantification of microorganisms is a significant step in studying the alpha and beta diversities within and between microbial communities respectively. Both identification and quantification of a given microbial community can be carried out using whole genome shotgun sequences with less bias than when using 16S-rDNA sequences. However, shared regions of DNA among reference genomes and taxonomic units pose a significant challenge in assigning reads correctly to their true origins. The existing microbial community profiling tools commonly deal with this problem by either preparing signature-based unique references or assigning an ambiguous read to its least common ancestor in a taxonomic tree. The former method is limited to making use of the reads which can be mapped to the curated regions, while the latter suffer from the lack of uniquely mapped reads at lower (more specific) taxonomic ranks. Moreover, even if the tools exhibited good performance in calling the organisms present in a sample, there is still room for improvement in determining the correct relative abundance of the organisms. We present a new method Species Level Identification of Microorganisms from Metagenomes (SLIMM) which addresses the above issues by using coverage information of reference genomes to remove unlikely genomes from the analysis and subsequently gain more uniquely mapped reads to assign at lower ranks of a taxonomic tree. SLIMM is based on a few, seemingly easy steps which when combined create a tool that outperforms state-of-the-art tools in run-time and memory usage while being on par or better in computing quantitative and qualitative information at species-level.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.