Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28367366›Full record

ArticlePeerJ2017

Automatic single- and multi-label enzymatic function prediction by machine learning.

Shervine Amidi, Afshine Amidi, Dimitrios Vlachakis, Nikos Paragios, Evangelia I Zacharaki

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PeerJ, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Computational prediction of disordered binding regions.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2023
    Review
  4. Epitranscriptomics of cardiovascular diseases (Review).International journal of molecular medicine · 2022
    Review
  5. A hierarchical deep learning based approach for multi-functional enzyme classification.Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society · 2021
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Machine learning for enzyme engineering, selection and design.Protein engineering, design & selection : PEDS · 2021
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. PSIONplusBiomolecules · 2020
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Shervine Amidi *Department of Applied Mathematics, Center for Visual Computing, Ecole Centrale de Paris (CentraleSupélec), Châtenay-Malabry, France.
Afshine Amidi *Department of Applied Mathematics, Center for Visual Computing, Ecole Centrale de Paris (CentraleSupélec), Châtenay-Malabry, France.
Dimitrios VlachakisMDAKM Group, Department of Computer Engineering and Informatics, University of Patras, Patras, Greece.ORCID 0000-0003-1823-6102
Nikos ParagiosDepartment of Applied Mathematics, Center for Visual Computing, Ecole Centrale de Paris (CentraleSupélec), Châtenay-Malabry, France.
Evangelia I ZacharakiDepartment of Applied Mathematics, Center for Visual Computing, Ecole Centrale de Paris (CentraleSupélec), Châtenay-Malabry, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The number of protein structures in the PDB database has been increasing more than 15-fold since 1999. The creation of computational models predicting enzymatic function is of major importance since such models provide the means to better understand the behavior of newly discovered enzymes when catalyzing chemical reactions. Until now, single-label classification has been widely performed for predicting enzymatic function limiting the application to enzymes performing unique reactions and introducing errors when multi-functional enzymes are examined. Indeed, some enzymes may be performing different reactions and can hence be directly associated with multiple enzymatic functions. In the present work, we propose a multi-label enzymatic function classification scheme that combines structural and amino acid sequence information. We investigate two fusion approaches (in the feature level and decision level) and assess the methodology for general enzymatic function prediction indicated by the first digit of the enzyme commission (EC) code (six main classes) on 40,034 enzymes from the PDB database. The proposed single-label and multi-label models predict correctly the actual functional activities in 97.8% and 95.5% (based on Hamming-loss) of the cases, respectively. Also the multi-label model predicts all possible enzymatic reactions in 85.4% of the multi-labeled enzymes when the number of reactions is unknown. Code and datasets are available at https://figshare.com/s/a63e0bafa9b71fc7cbd7.

Indexed as

Amino acid sequenceEnzyme classificationMulti-labelSingle-labelSmith-Waterman algorithmStructural information

Identifiers

PMID28367366
PMCPMC5374972

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.