Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28367155›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in plant science2017

Biotechnological Advancements and Begomovirus Management in Okra (

Gyan P Mishra, Bijendra Singh, Tania Seth, Achuit K Singh, Jaydeep Halder, Nagendran Krishnan, Shailesh K Tiwari, Prabhakar M Singh

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in plant science, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
8.1field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 79 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Plastome evidence repositionsFrontiers in plant science · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Breeding jassid-resistant okra (Frontiers in plant science · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Study of genetic variability and emerging strains ofPhysiology and molecular biology of plants : an international journal of functional plant biology · 2025
    Article
  6. Tapping into the potential of okra (Frontiers in plant science · 2025
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Genome Sequence of anMicrobiology resource announcements · 2021
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Yellow Mosaic Disease (YMD) of Mungbean (Frontiers in plant science · 2020
    Review
  20. Advances in the development and use ofPhysiology and molecular biology of plants : an international journal of functional plant biology · 2019
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Gyan P MishraDepartment of Biotechnology, ICAR-Indian Institute of Vegetable Research Varanasi, India.
Bijendra SinghDepartment of Biotechnology, ICAR-Indian Institute of Vegetable Research Varanasi, India.
Tania SethDepartment of Biotechnology, ICAR-Indian Institute of Vegetable Research Varanasi, India.
Achuit K SinghDepartment of Biotechnology, ICAR-Indian Institute of Vegetable Research Varanasi, India.
Jaydeep HalderDepartment of Biotechnology, ICAR-Indian Institute of Vegetable Research Varanasi, India.
Nagendran KrishnanDepartment of Biotechnology, ICAR-Indian Institute of Vegetable Research Varanasi, India.
Shailesh K TiwariDepartment of Biotechnology, ICAR-Indian Institute of Vegetable Research Varanasi, India.
Prabhakar M SinghDepartment of Biotechnology, ICAR-Indian Institute of Vegetable Research Varanasi, India.
Indian Institute of Vegetable Research · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite the importance of okra, as one of the important vegetable crop, very little attention has been paid to its genetic improvement using advanced biotechnological tools. The exploitation of marker assisted breeding in okra is often limited due to the availability of a few molecular markers, the absence of molecular genetic-map(s), and other molecular tools. Chromosome linkage-groups were not yet constructed for this crop and reports on marker development are very scanty and mostly hovering around cultivar characterization. Besides, very little progress has been observed for transgenic development. However, high throughput biotechnological tools like chromosome engineering, RNA interference (RNAi), marker-assisted recurrent selection (MARS), genome-wide selection (GWS), targeted gene replacement, next generation sequencing (NGS), and nanobiotechnology can provide a rapid way for okra improvement. Further, the etiology of many deadly viral diseases like the yellow vein mosaic virus (YVMV) and okra enation leaf curl virus (OELCV) in okra is broadly indistinct and has been shown to be caused by various begomovirus species. These diseases cause systemic infections and have a very effective mode of transmission; thus, preventing their spread has been very complicated. Biotechnological interventions have the potential to enhance okra production even under different viral-stress conditions. In this background, this review deals with the biotechnological advancements in okra

Indexed as

geminivirusesinfectious clonesladies' fingerOELCVrecombinationtranscriptomicsYVMV

Identifiers

PMID28367155
PMCPMC5355441
OpenAlexW2597301649

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.