Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28367149›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in immunology2017

Major Histocompatibility Complex (MHC) Class I and MHC Class II Proteins: Conformational Plasticity in Antigen Presentation.

Marek Wieczorek, Esam T Abualrous, Jana Sticht, Miguel Álvaro-Benito, Sebastian Stolzenberg, Frank Noé, Christian Freund

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in immunology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 554 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
554citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
22.8field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

554 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 988 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

494 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Marek WieczorekProtein Biochemistry, Institute for Biochemistry, Freie Universität Berlin , Berlin , Germany.
Esam T AbualrousComputational Molecular Biology Group, Institute for Mathematics , Berlin , Germany.
Jana StichtProtein Biochemistry, Institute for Biochemistry, Freie Universität Berlin , Berlin , Germany.
Miguel Álvaro-BenitoProtein Biochemistry, Institute for Biochemistry, Freie Universität Berlin , Berlin , Germany.
Sebastian StolzenbergComputational Molecular Biology Group, Institute for Mathematics , Berlin , Germany.
Frank NoéComputational Molecular Biology Group, Institute for Mathematics , Berlin , Germany.
Christian FreundProtein Biochemistry, Institute for Biochemistry, Freie Universität Berlin , Berlin , Germany.
Freie Universität Berlin · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Antigen presentation by major histocompatibility complex (MHC) proteins is essential for adaptive immunity. Prior to presentation, peptides need to be generated from proteins that are either produced by the cell's own translational machinery or that are funneled into the endo-lysosomal vesicular system. The prolonged interaction between a T cell receptor and specific pMHC complexes, after an extensive search process in secondary lymphatic organs, eventually triggers T cells to proliferate and to mount a specific cellular immune response. Once processed, the peptide repertoire presented by MHC proteins largely depends on structural features of the binding groove of each particular MHC allelic variant. Additionally, two peptide editors-tapasin for class I and HLA-DM for class II-contribute to the shaping of the presented peptidome by favoring the binding of high-affinity antigens. Although there is a vast amount of biochemical and structural information, the mechanism of the catalyzed peptide exchange for MHC class I and class II proteins still remains controversial, and it is not well understood why certain MHC allelic variants are more susceptible to peptide editing than others. Recent studies predict a high impact of protein intermediate states on MHC allele-specific peptide presentation, which implies a profound influence of MHC dynamics on the phenomenon of immunodominance and the development of autoimmune diseases. Here, we review the recent literature that describe MHC class I and II dynamics from a theoretical and experimental point of view and we highlight the similarities between MHC class I and class II dynamics despite the distinct functions they fulfill in adaptive immunity.

Indexed as

adaptive immunityantigen presentationHLAHLA-DMmajor histocompatibility complexpeptide exchangeprotein dynamicstapasin

Identifiers

PMID28367149
PMCPMC5355494
OpenAlexW2597129987

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.