Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28367127›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in psychiatry2017

Alterations of Intrinsic Brain Connectivity Patterns in Depression and Bipolar Disorders: A Critical Assessment of Magnetoencephalography-Based Evidence.

Golnoush Alamian, Ana-Sofía Hincapié, Etienne Combrisson, Thomas Thiery, Véronique Martel, Dmitrii Althukov, Karim Jerbi

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in psychiatry, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 51 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Caudothalamic dysfunction in drug-free suicidally depressed patients: an MEG study.European archives of psychiatry and clinical neuroscience · 2020
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 4 countries.

Golnoush AlamianDepartment of Psychology, University of Montreal , Montreal, QC , Canada.
Ana-Sofía HincapiéDepartment of Psychology, University of Montreal, Montreal, QC, Canada; Department of Computer Science, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago de Chile, Chile; Interdisciplinary Center for Neurosciences, School of Psychology, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago de Chile, Chile.
Etienne CombrissonDepartment of Psychology, University of Montreal, Montreal, QC, Canada; Center of Research and Innovation in Sport, Mental Processes and Motor Performance, University Claude Bernard Lyon I, University of Lyon, Villeurbanne, France; Brain Dynamics and Cognition, Lyon Neuroscience Research Center, INSERM U1028, UMR 5292, University of Lyon, Villeurbanne, France.
Thomas ThieryDepartment of Psychology, University of Montreal , Montreal, QC , Canada.
Véronique MartelDepartment of Psychology, University of Montreal , Montreal, QC , Canada.
Dmitrii AlthukovDepartment of Psychology, University of Montreal, Montreal, QC, Canada; Department of Computer Sciences, National Research Institution Higher School of Economics, Moscow, Russia; MEG Center, Moscow State University of Pedagogics and Education, Moscow, Russia.
Karim JerbiDepartment of Psychology, University of Montreal, Montreal, QC, Canada; Centre de recherche de l'Institut universitaire en santé mentale de Montréal, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Université de Montréal · CACentre de Recherche en Neurosciences de Lyon · FRLomonosov Moscow State University · RUPontificia Universidad Católica de Chile · CL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite being the object of a thriving field of clinical research, the investigation of intrinsic brain network alterations in psychiatric illnesses is still in its early days. Because the pathological alterations are predominantly probed using functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI), many questions about the electrophysiological bases of resting-state alterations in psychiatric disorders, particularly among mood disorder patients, remain unanswered. Alongside important research using electroencephalography (EEG), the specific recent contributions and future promise of magnetoencephalography (MEG) in this field are not fully recognized and valued. Here, we provide a critical review of recent findings from MEG resting-state connectivity within major depressive disorder (MDD) and bipolar disorder (BD). The clinical MEG resting-state results are compared with those previously reported with fMRI and EEG. Taken together, MEG appears to be a promising but still critically underexploited technique to unravel the neurophysiological mechanisms that mediate abnormal (both hyper- and hypo-) connectivity patterns involved in MDD and BD. In particular, a major strength of MEG is its ability to provide source-space estimations of neuromagnetic long-range rhythmic synchronization at various frequencies (i.e., oscillatory coupling). The reviewed literature highlights the relevance of probing local and interregional rhythmic synchronization to explore the pathophysiological underpinnings of each disorder. However, before we can fully take advantage of MEG connectivity analyses in psychiatry, several limitations inherent to MEG connectivity analyses need to be understood and taken into account. Thus, we also discuss current methodological challenges and outline paths for future research. MEG resting-state studies provide an important window onto perturbed spontaneous oscillatory brain networks and hence supply an important complement to fMRI-based resting-state measurements in psychiatric populations.

Indexed as

bipolar disorderconnectivitydepressionmagnetoencephalographymental illnessoscillationspsychiatryresting-state

Identifiers

PMID28367127
PMCPMC5355450
OpenAlexW2596270150

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.