Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28367078›Full record

ArticleTheoretical chemistry accounts2016

Long-range electrostatic corrections in multipolar/polarizable QM/MM simulations.

Eric G Kratz, Robert E Duke, G Andrés Cisneros

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Theoretical chemistry accounts, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. LICHEM 1.1: Recent Improvements and New Capabilities.Journal of chemical theory and computation · 2019
    Article
  12. PolarizableMolecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2018
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Quantum mechanical force fields for condensed phase molecular simulations.Journal of physics. Condensed matter : an Institute of Physics journal · 2017
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Eric G KratzDepartment of Chemistry, Wayne State University, Detroit, MI 48202, USA.
Robert E DukeDepartment of Chemistry, Wayne State University, Detroit, MI 48202, USA.
G Andrés CisnerosDepartment of Chemistry, Wayne State University, Detroit, MI 48202, USA.

Funding

Theory and Simulation of DNA Repair Enzymes; Mechanism, Structure and FunctionR01GM108583 · NIGMS · WAYNE STATE UNIVERSITY · PI CISNEROS, GERARDO ANDRES · 2014 to 2022
$2.9M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM108583
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Taking long-range electrostatic effects into account in classical and hybrid quantum mechanics-molecular mechanics (QM/MM) simulations is necessary for an accurate description of the system under study. We have recently developed a method, termed long-range electrostatic corrections (LREC), for monopolar QM/MM calculations. Here, we present an extension of LREC for multipolar/polarizable QM/MM simulations within the LICHEM software package. Reaction barriers and QM-MM interaction energies converge with a LREC cutoff between 20 and 25 Å, in agreement with our previous results. Additionally, the LREC approach for the QM-MM interactions can be smoothly combined with standard shifting or Ewald summation methods in the MM calculations. We recommend the use of QM(LREC)/MM(PME), where the QM region is treated with LREC and the MM region is treated with particle mesh Ewald (PME) summation. This combination is an excellent compromise between simplicity, speed, and accuracy for large QM/MM simulations.

Indexed as

Long-range electrostaticsLRECMultipolesPolarizableQM/MM

Identifiers

PMID28367078
PMCPMC5373107

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.