Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28366811›Full record

ArticleJournal of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics2017

The Association between Food Security and Store-Specific and Overall Food Shopping Behaviors.

Xiaonan Ma, Angela D Liese, James Hibbert, Bethany A Bell, Sara Wilcox, Patricia A Sharpe

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Xiaonan Ma
Angela D Liese
James Hibbert
Bethany A Bell
Sara Wilcox
Patricia A Sharpe

Funding

Evaluating a food hub's impact on food access, diet and weight in a food desertR01CA180336 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA AT COLUMBIA · PI WILCOX, SARA · 2013 to 2016
$2.2M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA180336
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFood security is a severe problem in the United States. Few studies have examined its relationship with food shopping behaviors.

objectiveThis study aimed to examine the association between food security and store-specific and overall food shopping among residents of low-income neighborhoods.

designWe conducted a cross-sectional study. PARTICIPANTS/

settingFive hundred twenty-seven households were recruited from two counties in South Carolina from November 2013 to May 2014, and 474 households were included in the final analysis. MAIN OUTCOMES MEASURES: Food security was assessed using the 18-item US-Household Food Security Module questionnaire, and classified into three categories: high or marginal food security (FS), low food security (LFS), and very low food security (VLFS). Store-specific shopping behaviors including frequency, store type, and transportation were queried via in-person interview for the three most-frequented grocery stores. Distance from participants' homes to their reported stores was calculated using Geographic Information Systems. STATISTICAL ANALYSES: Multivariate linear regression for analyses of distance and frequency and multinomial/ordinary logistic regression for analyses of store type and transportation were used.

resultsCompared to FS participants, a significantly higher proportion of VLFS participants reported a convenience/dollar store as their most-frequented store (odds ratio [OR] 2.31, 95% CI 1.08 to 4.95) or a lack of transportation (OR 2.04, 95% CI 1.25 to 3.33). They also shopped less frequently (b=-.31, P=0.03) at their third most-frequented store and traveled fewer total miles for shopping (b=-4.71, P=0.04). In analyses considering all stores jointly, LFS participants had lower odds of shopping at both supermarkets and convenience/dollar stores (OR 0.44, 95% CI 0.21 to 0.91) compared to food-secure residents.

conclusionsThe current findings suggest that households with VLFS tend to shop more frequently in stores that have less-healthful options, such as convenience/dollar stores. These findings lend support to ongoing community and policy interventions aimed at improving food access among food-insecure populations.

Indexed as

Choice BehaviorConsumer BehaviorFood SupplyAdultAgedCross-Sectional StudiesFamily CharacteristicsFemaleFood PreferencesHealth BehaviorHumansLinear ModelsLogistic ModelsMaleMiddle AgedPovertyGrocery store typeShopping distanceShopping frequencyStore type patternTransportation

Identifiers

PMID28366811
PMCPMC5621983

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.