Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28366580›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics2017

Influence of Age on Guideline-Concordant Cancer Care for Elderly Patients in the United States.

Penny Fang, Weiguo He, Daniel R Gomez, Karen E Hoffman, Benjamin D Smith, Sharon H Giordano, Reshma Jagsi, Grace L Smith

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 49 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Bifidobacterium modulation of tumor immunotherapy and its mechanism.Cancer immunology, immunotherapy : CII · 2024
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Penny FangDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
Weiguo HeDepartment of Health Services Research, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
Daniel R GomezDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
Karen E HoffmanDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
Benjamin D SmithDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas; Department of Health Services Research, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
Sharon H GiordanoDepartment of Health Services Research, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
Reshma JagsiDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
Grace L SmithDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas; Department of Health Services Research, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas. Electronic address: glsmith@mdanderson.org.
The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center · USUniversity of Michigan–Ann Arbor · US

Funding

Tumor Evolution and Metastasis ProgramP30CA016672 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI Scott Kopetz · 1985 to 2026
$290.8M
Technology Diffusion in Cancer: Geographic Variations, Facilitators, Outcomes, and CostsR01CA207216 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI SHIH, YA-CHEN TINA · 2016 to 2020
$1.6M
Economic Strain and Resilience in Cancer Patients: Assessing Patient-Reported Measures of the Burdens of TreatmentK07CA211804 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI SMITH, GRACE · 2016 to 2020
$853k
NCI NIH HHS K07 CA211804NCI NIH HHS P30 CA016672NCI NIH HHS R01 CA207216
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo examine the frequency of guideline-concordant cancer care in elderly patients, including "older" elderly (age ≥80 years). METHODS AND MATERIALS: Using the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results-Medicare dataset in patients aged ≥66 years diagnosed with nonmetastatic breast cancer (n=55,094), non-small cell lung (NSCLC) (n=36,203), or prostate cancer (n=86,544) from 2006 to 2011, chemotherapy, surgery, and radiation (RT) treatments were identified using claims. Pearson χ

resultsOlder patients were less likely to receive guideline-concordant curative treatment: in stage III breast cancer, receipt of postmastectomy RT (70%, 46%, and 21% in patients aged 66-79, 80-89, and ≥90 years, respectively; P<.0001); in stage I NSCLC, RT or surgery (89%, 80%, and 64% in age 66-79, 80-89, and ≥90 years; P<.0001); in stage III NSCLC, RT or surgery plus chemotherapy (79%, 58%, and 27% in age 66-79, 80-89, and ≥90 years; P<.0001); and in intermediate/high-risk prostate cancer, RT or prostatectomy (projected life expectancy >10 years: 85% and 82% in age 66-69 and 70-75 years; and ≤10 years: 70%, 42%, and 9% in age 76-79, 80-89, and ≥90 years; P<.0001). However, older patients were more likely to receive guideline-concordant de-intensified treatment: in stage I to II node-negative breast cancer, hypofractionated postlumpectomy RT (9%, 16%, and 23% in age 66-79, 80-89, and ≥90 years; P<.0001); in stage I estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer, observation after lumpectomy (12%, 42%, and 84% in age 66-79, 80-89, and ≥90 years; P<.0001); in stage I NSCLC, stereotactic body RT instead of surgery (7%, 16%, and 25% in age 66-79, 80-89, and ≥90 years; P<.0001); and in lower-risk prostate cancer, no active treatment (25%, 54%, and 68% in age 66-79, 80-89, and ≥90 years; P<.0001).

conclusionActual treatment of older elderly cancer patients frequently diverged from guidelines, especially in curative treatment of advanced disease. Results suggest a need for better metrics than existing guidelines alone to evaluate quality and appropriateness of care in this population.

Indexed as

Age FactorsAgedAged, 80 and overAntineoplastic AgentsBenchmarkingBreast NeoplasmsCarcinoma, Non-Small-Cell LungChi-Square DistributionCombined Modality TherapyFemaleGuideline AdherenceHumansKaplan-Meier EstimateLife ExpectancyLogistic ModelsLung NeoplasmsAntineoplastic Agents

Identifiers

PMID28366580
PMCPMC5504701
OpenAlexW2583779233

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.