Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28366282›Full record

ArticleDevelopmental cell2017

An Orchestrated Intron Retention Program in Meiosis Controls Timely Usage of Transcripts during Germ Cell Differentiation.

Chiara Naro, Ariane Jolly, Sara Di Persio, Pamela Bielli, Niclas Setterblad, Antonio J Alberdi, Elena Vicini, Raffaele Geremia, Pierre De la Grange, Claudio Sette

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Developmental cell, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 108 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
108citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

108 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Molecular Basis of Intron Retention inInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

48 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Chiara NaroDepartment of Biomedicine and Prevention, University of Rome Tor Vergata, Via Montpellier 1, 00133 Rome, Italy; Laboratories of Neuroembryology, Fondazione Santa Lucia IRCCS, 00143 Rome, Italy.
Ariane JollyGenoSplice Technology, iPEPS-ICM, Hôpital de la Pitié Salpêtrière, 75013 Paris, France.
Sara Di PersioFondazione Pasteur Cenci Bolognetti, Department of Anatomy, Histology, Forensic Medicine and Orthopedic, Section of Histology Sapienza University of Rome, 00161 Rome, Italy.
Pamela BielliDepartment of Biomedicine and Prevention, University of Rome Tor Vergata, Via Montpellier 1, 00133 Rome, Italy; Laboratories of Neuroembryology, Fondazione Santa Lucia IRCCS, 00143 Rome, Italy.
Niclas SetterbladIUH, Saint-Louis Hospital, 75010 Paris, France.
Antonio J AlberdiIUH, Saint-Louis Hospital, 75010 Paris, France.
Elena ViciniFondazione Pasteur Cenci Bolognetti, Department of Anatomy, Histology, Forensic Medicine and Orthopedic, Section of Histology Sapienza University of Rome, 00161 Rome, Italy.
Raffaele GeremiaDepartment of Biomedicine and Prevention, University of Rome Tor Vergata, Via Montpellier 1, 00133 Rome, Italy.
Pierre De la GrangeGenoSplice Technology, iPEPS-ICM, Hôpital de la Pitié Salpêtrière, 75013 Paris, France.
Claudio SetteDepartment of Biomedicine and Prevention, University of Rome Tor Vergata, Via Montpellier 1, 00133 Rome, Italy; Laboratories of Neuroembryology, Fondazione Santa Lucia IRCCS, 00143 Rome, Italy. Electronic address: claudio.sette@uniroma2.it.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Global transcriptome reprogramming during spermatogenesis ensures timely expression of factors in each phase of male germ cell differentiation. Spermatocytes and spermatids require particularly extensive reprogramming of gene expression to switch from mitosis to meiosis and to support gamete morphogenesis. Here, we uncovered an extensive alternative splicing program during this transmeiotic differentiation. Notably, intron retention was largely the most enriched pattern, with spermatocytes showing generally higher levels of retention compared with spermatids. Retained introns are characterized by weak splice sites and are enriched in genes with strong relevance for gamete function. Meiotic intron-retaining transcripts (IRTs) were exclusively localized in the nucleus. However, differently from other developmentally regulated IRTs, they are stable RNAs, showing longer half-life than properly spliced transcripts. Strikingly, fate-mapping experiments revealed that IRTs are recruited onto polyribosomes days after synthesis. These studies reveal an unexpected function for regulated intron retention in modulation of the timely expression of select transcripts during spermatogenesis.

Indexed as

Alternative SplicingAnimalsCell DifferentiationCell NucleusGene OntologyIntronsMaleMeiosisMice, Inbred C57BLRegulatory Sequences, Nucleic AcidRNA, MessengerRNA StabilitySpermatogenesisSpermatozoaTranscription, GeneticTranscriptomeRNA, Messengeralternative splicinggerm cell differentiationintron retentionmRNA stabilityspermatogenesistranscriptome profiling

Identifiers

PMID28366282
PMCPMC5392497

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.