Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28366169›Full record

ArticleGenome biology2017

Functional implications of Neandertal introgression in modern humans.

Michael Dannemann, Kay Prüfer, Janet Kelso

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genome biology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 50 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
50citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

50 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Archaic hominin admixture and its consequences for modern humans.Current opinion in genetics & development · 2025
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Denisovan admixture facilitated environmental adaptation in Papua New Guinean populations.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Methods and Insights from Single-Cell Expression Quantitative Trait Loci.Annual review of genomics and human genetics · 2023
    Review
  16. Large-scale functional screen identifies genetic variants with splicing effects in modern and archaic humans.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Predicting Archaic Hominin Phenotypes from Genomic Data.Annual review of genomics and human genetics · 2022
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Michael DannemannMax Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology, Deutscher Platz 6, Leipzig, 04103, Germany. michael_dannemann@eva.mpg.de.ORCID 0000-0002-7076-8731
Kay PrüferMax Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology, Deutscher Platz 6, Leipzig, 04103, Germany.
Janet KelsoMax Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology, Deutscher Platz 6, Leipzig, 04103, Germany. kelso@eva.mpg.de.ORCID 0000-0002-3618-322X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAdmixture between early modern humans and Neandertals approximately 50,000-60,000 years ago has resulted in 1.5-4% Neandertal ancestry in the genomes of present-day non-Africans. Evidence is accumulating that some of these archaic alleles are advantageous for modern humans, while others are deleterious; however, the major mechanism by which these archaic alleles act has not been fully explored.

resultsHere we assess the contributions of introgressed non-synonymous and regulatory variants to modern human protein and gene expression variation. We show that gene expression changes are more often associated with Neandertal ancestry than expected, and that the introgressed non-synonymous variants tend to have less predicted functional effect on modern human proteins than mutations that arose on the human lineage. Conversely, introgressed alleles contribute proportionally more to expression variation than non-introgressed alleles.

conclusionsOur results suggest that the major influence of Neandertal introgressed alleles is through their effects on gene regulation.

Indexed as

Evolution, MolecularAllelesAmino Acid SequenceAnimalsGene ExpressionGene FrequencyGenetic VariationGenome-Wide Association StudyHumansMultigene FamilyNeanderthalsPhenotypeGene expression regulationHuman evolutionNeandertal introgressionProtein sequence variation

Identifiers

PMID28366169
PMCPMC5376702

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.