Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28365909›Full record

ArticleChild's nervous system : ChNS : official journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery2017

A mosaic pattern of INI1/SMARCB1 protein expression distinguishes Schwannomatosis and NF2-associated peripheral schwannomas from solitary peripheral schwannomas and NF2-associated vestibular schwannomas.

Rosario Caltabiano, Gaetano Magro, Agata Polizzi, Andrea Domenico Praticò, Andrea Ortensi, Valerio D'Orazi, Andrea Panunzi, Pietro Milone, Luigi Maiolino, Francesco Nicita and 8 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Child's nervous system : ChNS : official journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
4.0field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 64 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Genetic Basis and Clinical Management of Schwannomatosis.Journal of Korean Neurosurgical Society · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Current Understanding of Neurofibromatosis Type 1, 2, and Schwannomatosis.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. What's new in nerve sheath tumors.Virchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology · 2020
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Rosario CaltabianoDepartment of Medical and Surgical Sciences and Advanced Technologies "G. F. Ingrassia", Section of Anatomic Pathology, University of Catania, Catania, Italy.
Gaetano MagroDepartment of Medical and Surgical Sciences and Advanced Technologies "G. F. Ingrassia", Section of Anatomic Pathology, University of Catania, Catania, Italy.
Agata PolizziNational Centre for Rare Diseases, Istituto Superiore di Sanità, Rome, Italy.
Andrea Domenico PraticòUnit of Rare Diseases of the Nervous System in Childhood, Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Section of Pediatrics and Child Neuropsychiatry, University of Catania, AOU "Policlinico-Vittorio Emanuele", Via S. Sofia, 78, 95124, Catania, Italy.
Andrea OrtensiUnit of General Microsurgery and Hand Surgery, University of Rome "La Sapienza" and Hospital "Fabia Mater", Rome, Italy.
Valerio D'OraziUnit of General Microsurgery and Hand Surgery, University of Rome "La Sapienza" and Hospital "Fabia Mater", Rome, Italy.
Andrea PanunziUnit of General Microsurgery and Hand Surgery, University of Rome "La Sapienza" and Hospital "Fabia Mater", Rome, Italy.
Pietro MiloneDepartment of Medical and Surgical Sciences and Advanced Technologies "G. Ingrassia", Section of Radiology, University of Catania, Catania, Italy.
Luigi MaiolinoDepartment of Medical and Surgical Sciences and Advanced Technologies "G. Ingrassia", Section of Otolaryngology, University of Catania, Catania, Italy.
Francesco NicitaDepartment of Paediatrics and Child Neuropsychiatry, Section of Paediatric Neurology, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
Gabriele Lorenzo CaponeDepartment of Biomedical, Experimental and Clinical Sciences "Mario Serio", Section of Medical Genetics, University of Florence, Florence, Italy.
Roberta SestiniDepartment of Biomedical, Experimental and Clinical Sciences "Mario Serio", Section of Medical Genetics, University of Florence, Florence, Italy.
Irene PaganiniDepartment of Biomedical, Experimental and Clinical Sciences "Mario Serio", Section of Medical Genetics, University of Florence, Florence, Italy.
Mariella Muglia11 Unit of Molecular Genetics, Institute of Neurological Sciences, National Research Council, Cosenza, Italy.
Sebastiano Cavallaro11 Unit of Molecular Genetics, Institute of Neurological Sciences, National Research Council, Cosenza, Italy.
Salvatore LanzafameDepartment of Medical and Surgical Sciences and Advanced Technologies "G. F. Ingrassia", Section of Anatomic Pathology, University of Catania, Catania, Italy.
Laura PapiDepartment of Biomedical, Experimental and Clinical Sciences "Mario Serio", Section of Medical Genetics, University of Florence, Florence, Italy.
Martino RuggieriUnit of Rare Diseases of the Nervous System in Childhood, Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Section of Pediatrics and Child Neuropsychiatry, University of Catania, AOU "Policlinico-Vittorio Emanuele", Via S. Sofia, 78, 95124, Catania, Italy. m.ruggieri@unict.it.
University of Catania · ITSapienza University of Rome · ITUniversity of Florence · ITNational Research Council · ITIstituto Superiore di Sanità · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe INI1/SMARCB1 gene protein product has been implicated in the direct pathogenesis of schwannomas from patients with one form of schwannomatosis [SWNTS1; MIM # 162091] showing a mosaic pattern of loss of protein expression by immunohistochemistry [93% in familial vs. 55% in sporadic cases]. AIM OF STUDY: To verify whether such INI1/SMARCB1 mosaic pattern could be extended to all schwannomas arising in the sporadic and familial schwannomatoses [i.e. to SMARCB1-related (SWNTS1) or LZTR1-related (SWNTS2) schwannomatosis or to SMARCB1/LZTR1-negative schwannomatosis] and whether it could be involved in classical NF2 or solitary peripheral schwannomas

methodsWe blindly analysed schwannoma samples obtained from a total of 22 patients including (a) 2 patients (2 males; aged 38 and 55 years) affected by non-familial SMARCB1-associated schwannomatosis (SWTNS1); (b) 1 patient (1 female; aged 33 years) affected by familial schwannomatosis (SWTNS1/ SMARCB1 germ line mutations); (c) 5 patients (3 males, 2 females; aged 33 to 35 years) affected by non-familial (sporadic) LZTR1-associated schwannomatosis (SWNTS2); (d) 3 patients (3 males; aged 35 to 47 years) affected by familial schwannomatosis (SWTNS2/ LZTR1 germ line mutations); (e) 2 patients (1 male, 1 female; aged 63 and 49 years, respectively) affected by non-familial schwannomatosis (SWTNS, negative for SMARCB1, LZTR1 and NF2 gene mutations); (f) 4 patients (3 males, 1 females; aged 15 to 24 years) affected by classical NF2 (NF2: harbouring NF2 germ line mutations; and (g) 5 patients (3 males, 2 females; aged 33 to 68 years) who had solitary schwannomas. [follow-up = 15-30 years; negative for constitutional/somatic mutation analysis for the SMARCB1, LZTR1 and NF2 genes] were (blindly) analyzed. The INI1/SMARCB1 immunostaining pattern was regarded as (1) diffuse positive nuclear staining [= retained expression] or (2) mosaic pattern [mixed positive/negative nuclei = loss of expression in a subset of tumour cells].

resultsAll solitary peripheral schwannomas and NF2-associated vestibular schwannomas showed diffuse nuclear INI1/SMARCB1 staining in 97-100% of neoplastic cells; schwannomas obtained from all cases of non-familial and familial schwannomatosis and NF2-associated non-vestibular schwannomas showed a mosaic pattern ranging from 10 to 70% of INI1/SMARCB1-positive expression. We did not record a complete lack of nuclear staining.

conclusionsThe present data suggests that (a) mosaic loss of immunohistochemical INI1/SMARCB1 expression, despite the interlesional variability, is a reliable marker of schwannomatosis regardless of the involved gene and it might help in the differential diagnosis of schwannomatosis vs. solitary schwannomas and (b) INI1/SMARCB1 expression is not useful in the differential with mosaic NF2, since NF2-associated peripheral schwannomas show the same immunohistochemical pattern.

Indexed as

Gene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticAdolescentAdultFemaleGenes, Neurofibromatosis 2HumansMaleMiddle AgedNeurilemmomaNeuroma, AcousticSMARCB1 ProteinYoung AdultSMARCB1 ProteinSMARCB1 protein, humanHistologyImmunohistochemistryINI1LZTR1MosaicismNeurofibromatosisNeurofibromatosis type 2NF2SchwannomatosisSMARCB1SWNTS

Identifiers

PMID28365909
OpenAlexW2601038163

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.