Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28365893›Full record

ArticleSurgery today2017

Amylase concentration in drainage fluid as a predictive factor for severe postoperative pancreatic fistula in patients with gastric cancer.

Yoshiki Taniguchi, Yukinori Kurokawa, Jota Mikami, Koji Tanaka, Yasuhiro Miyazaki, Tomoki Makino, Tsuyoshi Takahashi, Makoto Yamasaki, Kiyokazu Nakajima, Shuji Takiguchi and 2 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Surgery today, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Abdominal Drainage and Amylase Measurement for Detection of Leakage After Gastrectomy for Gastric Cancer.Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract · 2018
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Yoshiki TaniguchiDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, 2-2-E2, Yamadaoka, Suita, Osaka, Japan.
Yukinori KurokawaDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, 2-2-E2, Yamadaoka, Suita, Osaka, Japan. ykurokawa@gesurg.med.osaka-u.ac.jp.
Jota MikamiDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, 2-2-E2, Yamadaoka, Suita, Osaka, Japan.
Koji TanakaDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, 2-2-E2, Yamadaoka, Suita, Osaka, Japan.
Yasuhiro MiyazakiDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, 2-2-E2, Yamadaoka, Suita, Osaka, Japan.
Tomoki MakinoDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, 2-2-E2, Yamadaoka, Suita, Osaka, Japan.
Tsuyoshi TakahashiDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, 2-2-E2, Yamadaoka, Suita, Osaka, Japan.
Makoto YamasakiDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, 2-2-E2, Yamadaoka, Suita, Osaka, Japan.
Kiyokazu NakajimaDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, 2-2-E2, Yamadaoka, Suita, Osaka, Japan.
Shuji TakiguchiDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, 2-2-E2, Yamadaoka, Suita, Osaka, Japan.
Masaki MoriDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, 2-2-E2, Yamadaoka, Suita, Osaka, Japan.
Yuichiro DokiDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, 2-2-E2, Yamadaoka, Suita, Osaka, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposePostoperative pancreatic fistula (PPF) sometimes occurs after gastrectomy. We examined the risk factors for severe PPF and evaluated the predictive value of amylase concentration in drainage fluid.

methodsWe retrospectively reviewed 591 patients who underwent curative gastrectomy for gastric cancer. A multivariate analysis was conducted to identify the risk factors for severe PPF. Receiver operating characteristic curves were used to identify the appropriate amylase cut-off value to predict severe PPF.

resultsSevere PPF occurred in 23 (3.9%) cases. The multivariate analysis indicated that splenectomy (P = 0.009) was the only significant risk factor. The area under the curve of amylase in drainage fluid for predicting severe PPF on postoperative day (POD) 3 was much greater than that on POD 1 (0.972 vs. 0.894). When the cut-off values for amylase were determined to be 2900 U/L on POD 1 and 2100 U/L on POD 3, the risk ratio for severe PPF on POD 3 was higher than that on POD 1 (99.2 vs. 30.2).

conclusionsSplenectomy was an independent risk factor for severe PPF. An amylase level of 2100 U/L on POD 3 may be a reliable cut-off value for the early diagnosis of patients at high risk of severe PPF.

Indexed as

DrainageGastrectomyAdultAgedAmylasesBiomarkersBody FluidsFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPancreatic FistulaPostoperative ComplicationsPredictive Value of TestsRetrospective StudiesRisk FactorsAmylasesBiomarkersAmylase concentrationGastric cancerPancreatic fistula

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.