Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28365873›Full record

ArticleDysphagia2017

Effects of Esophageal Acidification on Troublesome Symptoms: An Approach to Characterize True Acid GERD in Dysphagic Neonates.

Maneesha Sivalingam, Swetha Sitaram, Kathryn A Hasenstab, Lai Wei, Frederick W Woodley, Sudarshan R Jadcherla

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Dysphagia, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Diagnostic utility of impedance-pH monitoring in infants of diabetic mothers with oral feeding difficulties.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2021
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Maneesha SivalingamInnovative Neonatal and Infant Feeding Disorders Program, Center for Perinatal Research, The Research Institute at Nationwide Children's Hospital, Columbus, OH, USA.
Swetha SitaramInnovative Neonatal and Infant Feeding Disorders Program, Center for Perinatal Research, The Research Institute at Nationwide Children's Hospital, Columbus, OH, USA.
Kathryn A HasenstabInnovative Neonatal and Infant Feeding Disorders Program, Center for Perinatal Research, The Research Institute at Nationwide Children's Hospital, Columbus, OH, USA.
Lai WeiCenter for Biostatistics, The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, OH, USA.
Frederick W WoodleyDepartment of Pediatrics, The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, OH, USA.
Sudarshan R JadcherlaInnovative Neonatal and Infant Feeding Disorders Program, Center for Perinatal Research, The Research Institute at Nationwide Children's Hospital, Columbus, OH, USA. Sudarshan.Jadcherla@nationwidechildrens.org.
Nationwide Children's Hospital · USThe Ohio State University · US

Funding

Pathophysiology of Aerodigestive Reflexes in InfantsR01DK068158 · NIDDK · RESEARCH INST NATIONWIDE CHILDREN'S HOSP · PI JADCHERLA, SUDARSHAN R · 2006 to 2016
$3.7M
NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK068158
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To quantify and compare maximal extent (height) of acid reflux events (AREs) on symptom generation in dysphagic neonates. Dysphagic neonates (N = 53), born at 30 ± 5.3 weeks gestation, underwent 24-hour pH-impedance study for the evaluation of troublesome symptoms purported to be due to gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). AREs (pH < 4 for >4 s) detected by impedance (Z) were categorized by maximal extent as refluxate reaching distal (Z6, Z5), middle (Z4, Z3), or proximal (Z2, Z1) impedance channels. AREs reaching the pH sensor only were categorized as distal. Symptom correlation (%, symptom index, symptom sensitivity index, and symptom associated probability) and temporal characteristics (clearance times) of AREs were analyzed using linear mixed and GEE models comparing height categories presented as mean ± SEM, median (IQR), and OR (95% CI). Of the 2003 AREs, 1) distal extent AREs (n = 1642) had increased frequency (p < 0.05), decreased ACT (p < 0.05), and decreased acidity (p < 0.05); 2) in middle and proximal AREs, acid clearance was longer than bolus clearance, (p < 0.01); and 3) the odds of having cardiorespiratory (cough or sneeze) symptoms are increased with proximal and middle AREs (p < 0.05). Most proximal ascent of AREs into middle or proximal esophagus likely activates protective aerodigestive reflexes (peristalsis) or vigilant states to facilitate bolus and chemical clearance. Heightened esophageal sensitivity, acid neutralization delays, or clearance mechanism delays may accentuate multi-systemic troublesome symptoms.

Indexed as

Deglutition DisordersElectric ImpedanceEsophageal pH MonitoringEsophagusFemaleGastroesophageal RefluxHumansHydrogen-Ion ConcentrationInfant, NewbornLinear ModelsMalePeristalsisAcid refluxDeglutitionDeglutition disordersDysphagiaGERDSwallowing

Identifiers

PMID28365873
PMCPMC5733803
OpenAlexW2601351343

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.