Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28365735›Full record

ArticleDatabase : the journal of biological databases and curation2017

AnnoSys-implementation of a generic annotation system for schema-based data using the example of biodiversity collection data.

L Suhrbier, W-H Kusber, O Tschöpe, A Güntsch, W G Berendsohn

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Database : the journal of biological databases and curation, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Improved standardization of transcribed digital specimen data.Database : the journal of biological databases and curation · 2019
    Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

L SuhrbierBotanic Garden and Botanical Museum, Freie Universität Berlin, Königin-Luise-Str. 6-8, 14195 Berlin, Germany.
W-H KusberBotanic Garden and Botanical Museum, Freie Universität Berlin, Königin-Luise-Str. 6-8, 14195 Berlin, Germany.
O TschöpeBotanic Garden and Botanical Museum, Freie Universität Berlin, Königin-Luise-Str. 6-8, 14195 Berlin, Germany.
A GüntschBotanic Garden and Botanical Museum, Freie Universität Berlin, Königin-Luise-Str. 6-8, 14195 Berlin, Germany.
W G BerendsohnBotanic Garden and Botanical Museum, Freie Universität Berlin, Königin-Luise-Str. 6-8, 14195 Berlin, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Biological research collections holding billions of specimens world-wide provide the most important baseline information for systematic biodiversity research. Increasingly, specimen data records become available in virtual herbaria and data portals. The traditional (physical) annotation procedure fails here, so that an important pathway of research documentation and data quality control is broken. In order to create an online annotation system, we analysed, modeled and adapted traditional specimen annotation workflows. The AnnoSys system accesses collection data from either conventional web resources or the Biological Collection Access Service (BioCASe) and accepts XML-based data standards like ABCD or DarwinCore. It comprises a searchable annotation data repository, a user interface, and a subscription based message system. We describe the main components of AnnoSys and its current and planned interoperability with biodiversity data portals and networks. Details are given on the underlying architectural model, which implements the W3C OpenAnnotation model and allows the adaptation of AnnoSys to different problem domains. Advantages and disadvantages of different digital annotation and feedback approaches are discussed. For the biodiversity domain, AnnoSys proposes best practice procedures for digital annotations of complex records. Database URL: https://annosys.bgbm.fu-berlin.de/AnnoSys/AnnoSys.

Indexed as

BiodiversityDatabases, FactualModels, TheoreticalPlantsData Curation

Identifiers

PMID28365735
PMCPMC5502362

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.