Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28365724›Full record

ArticleDatabase : the journal of biological databases and curation2017

Actionable, long-term stable and semantic web compatible identifiers for access to biological collection objects.

Anton Güntsch, Roger Hyam, Gregor Hagedorn, Simon Chagnoux, Dominik Röpert, Ana Casino, Gabi Droege, Falko Glöckler, Karsten Gödderz, Quentin Groom and 8 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Database : the journal of biological databases and curation, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Aggregation of Italian Lichen Data in ITALIC 7.0.Journal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. People are essential to linking biodiversity data.Database : the journal of biological databases and curation · 2020
    Article
  12. Article
  13. NCBI Taxonomy: a comprehensive update on curation, resources and tools.Database : the journal of biological databases and curation · 2020
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. The NCBI BioCollections Database.Database : the journal of biological databases and curation · 2018
    Article
  18. Toward a service-based workflow for automated information extraction from herbarium specimens.Database : the journal of biological databases and curation · 2018
    Article
  19. Article
  20. DifferentiatingPhytoKeys · 2017
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors.

Anton GüntschBotanic Garden and Botanical Museum Berlin, Freie Universität Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Roger HyamRoyal Botanic Garden Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Gregor HagedornMuseum für Naturkunde Berlin, Leibniz-Institute for Evolution and Biodiversity, Berlin, Germany.
Simon ChagnouxMuseum National d'Histoire Naturelle Paris, Paris, France.
Dominik RöpertBotanic Garden and Botanical Museum Berlin, Freie Universität Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Ana CasinoCETAF-Consortium of European Taxonomic Facilities, Brussels, Belgium.
Gabi DroegeBotanic Garden and Botanical Museum Berlin, Freie Universität Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Falko GlöcklerMuseum für Naturkunde Berlin, Leibniz-Institute for Evolution and Biodiversity, Berlin, Germany.
Karsten GödderzCETAF-Consortium of European Taxonomic Facilities, Brussels, Belgium.
Quentin GroomBotanic Garden Meise, Meise, Belgium.
Jana HoffmannMuseum für Naturkunde Berlin, Leibniz-Institute for Evolution and Biodiversity, Berlin, Germany.
Ayco HollemanNaturalis Biodiversity Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Matúš KempaInstitute of Botany, Plant Science and Biodiversity Center, Slovak Academy of Sciences, Bratislava, Slovakia.
Hanna KoivulaFinnish Museum of Natural History, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.
Karol MarholdInstitute of Botany, Plant Science and Biodiversity Center, Slovak Academy of Sciences, Bratislava, Slovakia.
Nicky NicolsonBiodiversity Informatics & Spatial Analysis, Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, London, UK.
Vincent S SmithDepartment of Life Sciences, The Natural History Museum, UK.
Dagmar TriebelSNSB IT Center, Staatliche Naturwissenschaftliche Sammlungen Bayerns, München, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

With biodiversity research activities being increasingly shifted to the web, the need for a system of persistent and stable identifiers for physical collection objects becomes increasingly pressing. The Consortium of European Taxonomic Facilities agreed on a common system of HTTP-URI-based stable identifiers which is now rolled out to its member organizations. The system follows Linked Open Data principles and implements redirection mechanisms to human-readable and machine-readable representations of specimens facilitating seamless integration into the growing semantic web. The implementation of stable identifiers across collection organizations is supported with open source provider software scripts, best practices documentations and recommendations for RDF metadata elements facilitating harmonized access to collection information in web portals. Database URL: : http://cetaf.org/cetaf-stable-identifiers.

Indexed as

BiodiversityDatabases, FactualNatural Language ProcessingSemantic WebSoftware

Identifiers

PMID28365724
PMCPMC5467547

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.