Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28365631›Full record

ArticleClinical medicine (London, England)2017

Management of acute intracerebral haemorrhage - an update.

Zhe Kang Law, Jason P Appleton, Philip M Bath, Nikola Sprigg

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical medicine (London, England), 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Luteolin Exerts NeuroprotectionFrontiers in pharmacology · 2019
    Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Zhe Kang LawUniversity of Nottingham, UK.
Jason P AppletonUniversity of Nottingham, UK.
Philip M BathUniversity of Nottingham, UK.
Nikola SpriggUniversity of Nottingham, UK nikola.sprigg@nottingham.ac.uk.

Funding

Department of Health 11/129/109
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Managing acute intracerebral haemorrhage is a challenging task for physicians. Evidence shows that outcome can be improved with admission to an acute stroke unit and active care, including urgent reversal of anticoagulant effects and, potentially, intensive blood pressure reduction. Nevertheless, many management issues remain controversial, including the use of haemostatic therapy, selection of patients for neurosurgery and neurocritical care, the extent of investigations for underlying causes and the benefit versus risk of restarting antithrombotic therapy after an episode of intracerebral haemorrhage.

Indexed as

Cerebral HemorrhageAcute DiseaseBrainHumansNeuroimagingPractice Guidelines as TopicAntithromboticblood pressureintracerebral haemorrhagemanagementneurosurgerystroke

Identifiers

PMID28365631
PMCPMC6297624

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.