Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28365628›Full record

ArticleClinical medicine (London, England)2017

The latest national clinical guideline for stroke.

Anthony George Rudd, Audrey Bowen, Gavin R Young, Martin A James

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical medicine (London, England), 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 61 papers, 9 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
61citing papers in PubMed, 9 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

61 citing papers in PubMed, 9 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. A systematic review and synthesis of global stroke guidelines on behalf of the World Stroke Organization.International journal of stroke : official journal of the International Stroke Society · 2023
    Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Pooled it
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Domain-specific cognitive impairment 6 months after stroke: The value of early cognitive screening.International journal of stroke : official journal of the International Stroke Society · 2024
    Article
  19. Observational
  20. Review

1 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Anthony George RuddKings College London, consultant stroke physician, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, national clinical director for stroke, NHS England and associate director, Stroke Programme, Royal College of Physicians, London, UK Anthony.rudd@kcl.ac.uk.
Audrey BowenDivision of Neuroscience and Experimental Psychology, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
Gavin R YoungSouth Tees Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, North Yorkshire, UK.
Martin A JamesRoyal Devon and Exeter Hospital, University of Exeter Medical School, Exeter, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

Practice Guidelines as TopicStrokeHumansStroke Rehabilitation

Identifiers

PMID28365628
PMCPMC6297617

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.