Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28365426›Full record

ArticleColloids and surfaces. B, Biointerfaces2017

Rapid separation of bacteria from blood - Chemical aspects.

Mahsa Alizadeh, Ryan L Wood, Clara M Buchanan, Colin G Bledsoe, Madison E Wood, Daniel S McClellan, Rae Blanco, Tanner V Ravsten, Ghaleb A Husseini, Caroline L Hickey and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Colloids and surfaces. B, Biointerfaces, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Growth and Distribution of Bacteria in Contaminated Whole Blood and Derived Blood Components.Transfusion medicine and hemotherapy : offizielles Organ der Deutschen Gesellschaft fur Transfusionsmedizin und Immunhamatologie · 2024
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Mahsa AlizadehChemical Engineering Department, Brigham Young University, Provo, UT 84602, United States.
Ryan L WoodChemical Engineering Department, Brigham Young University, Provo, UT 84602, United States.
Clara M BuchananChemical Engineering Department, Brigham Young University, Provo, UT 84602, United States.
Colin G BledsoeChemical Engineering Department, Brigham Young University, Provo, UT 84602, United States.
Madison E WoodDepartment of Microbiology and Molecular Biology, Brigham Young University, Provo, UT 84602, United States.
Daniel S McClellanChemical Engineering Department, Brigham Young University, Provo, UT 84602, United States.
Rae BlancoChemical Engineering Department, Brigham Young University, Provo, UT 84602, United States.
Tanner V RavstenChemical Engineering Department, Brigham Young University, Provo, UT 84602, United States.
Ghaleb A HusseiniChemical Engineering Department, American University of Sharjah, Sharjah, United Arab Emirates.
Caroline L HickeyChemical Engineering Department, Brigham Young University, Provo, UT 84602, United States.
Richard A RobisonDepartment of Microbiology and Molecular Biology, Brigham Young University, Provo, UT 84602, United States.
William G PittChemical Engineering Department, Brigham Young University, Provo, UT 84602, United States. Electronic address: pitt@byu.edu.

Funding

Multiplexed, Non-Amplified, Nucleic Acid-Based Identification of Multidrug Resistant Pathogens Using an Integrated Optofluidic PlatformR01AI116989 · NIAID · BRIGHAM YOUNG UNIVERSITY · PI HAWKINS, AARON R., PITT, WILLIAM G · 2015 to 2019
$5.4M
NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI116989
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To rapidly diagnose infectious organisms causing blood sepsis, bacteria must be rapidly separated from blood, a very difficult process considering that concentrations of bacteria are many orders of magnitude lower than concentrations of blood cells. We have successfully separated bacteria from red and white blood cells using a sedimentation process in which the separation is driven by differences in density and size. Seven mL of whole human blood spiked with bacteria is placed in a 12-cm hollow disk and spun at 3000rpm for 1min. The red and white cells sediment more than 30-fold faster than bacteria, leaving much of the bacteria in the plasma. When the disk is slowly decelerated, the plasma flows to a collection site and the red and white cells are trapped in the disk. Analysis of the recovered plasma shows that about 36% of the bacteria is recovered in the plasma. The plasma is not perfectly clear of red blood cells, but about 94% have been removed. This paper describes the effects of various chemical aspects of this process, including the influence of anticoagulant chemistry on the separation efficiency and the use of wetting agents and platelet aggregators that may influence the bacterial recovery. In a clinical scenario, the recovered bacteria can be subsequently analyzed to determine their species and resistance to various antibiotics.

Indexed as

Equipment DesignAnticoagulantsBacteremiaBlood PlateletsCell SeparationCentrifugationCitratesEdetic AcidErythrocytesEscherichia coliHeparinHumansLeukocytesModels, BiologicalSodium CitrateAnticoagulantsCitratesEdetic AcidHeparinSodium CitrateBacterial bloodstream infectionBacterial separationCentrifugationE. coliHuman bloodSedimentation

Identifiers

PMID28365426
PMCPMC5456291

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.