ReviewInternational journal of cardiology2017
Sudden cardiac death in 2017: Spotlight on prediction and prevention.
Review in International journal of cardiology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
28 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Diagnostic role of postmortem CK-MB in cardiac death: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Forensic science, medicine, and pathology · 2020Pooled it
- Clinical Triage of Individuals With Warning Symptoms of Imminent Cardiac Arrest.Circulation. Arrhythmia and electrophysiology · 2026Observational
- Population Modeling Approach for Human Cardiac Arrhythmia Risk Prediction.Circulation. Arrhythmia and electrophysiology · 2026Article
- Multi-omics in cardiac arrest: a systematic review.Resuscitation plus · 2026Review
- The effect of online CPR training on the knowledge and practice of the Red Crescent Student Association Volunteers during the COVID-19 pandemic: A randomized clinical trial study.Resuscitation plus · 2025Article
- Prevention of Sudden Cardiac Death: Beyond Automated External Defibrillators and Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillators.Circulation · 2024Article
- Characterization of global research trends and prospects on sudden coronary death: A literature visualization analysis.Heliyon · 2023Article
- Forensic identification of sudden cardiac death: a new approach combining metabolomics and machine learning.Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry · 2023Article
- Sudden Cardiac Death in Patients With Type 1 Versus Type 2 Diabetes.Mayo Clinic proceedings · 2022Article
- The role of pulse timing in cardiac defibrillation.Frontiers in network physiology · 2022Article
- Novel Indel Variation of NPC1 Gene Associates With Risk of Sudden Cardiac Death.Frontiers in genetics · 2022Article
- Cardiomyocyte-specific deletion of β-catenin protects mouse hearts from ventricular arrhythmias after myocardial infarction.Scientific reports · 2021Article
- Diagnostic Yield of Genetic Testing in Sudden Cardiac Death with Autopsy Findings of Uncertain Significance.Journal of clinical medicine · 2021Article
- Arrhythmogenic effects of ultra-long and bistable cardiac action potentials.PLoS computational biology · 2021Article
- Sudden cardiac arrest with shockable rhythm in patients with heart failure.Heart rhythm · 2020Article
- Multi-Ethnic Genome-Wide Association Study of Decomposed Cardioelectric Phenotypes Illustrates Strategies to Identify and Characterize Evidence of Shared Genetic Effects for Complex Traits.Circulation. Genomic and precision medicine · 2020Article
- Association of non-shockable initial rhythm and psychotropic medication in sudden cardiac arrest.International journal of cardiology. Heart & vasculature · 2020Article
- Antihypertensive therapy and sudden cardiac death, should we expect the unexpected?Journal of human hypertension · 2020Review
- The Effect of Basic CPR Training on Adults' Knowledge and Performance in Rural Areas of Iran: A Quasi-Experimental Study.Open access emergency medicine : OAEM · 2020Article
- Autonomic Control of the Heart and Its Clinical Impact. A Personal Perspective.Frontiers in physiology · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
Abstract
This commentary will provide a brief synopsis of the progress made in prediction and prevention of sudden cardiac death (SCD), the challenges that remain, and the opportunities available to make a real impact in this field. The dawning of the new millennium saw the prophylactic implantable defibrillator (ICD) firmly established as the major primary prevention modality, poised to make a major impact on the burden of SCD. More than a decade and a half later, has this expectation been realized? The modest impact of the primary prevention ICD on SCD burden is largely due to the now well-recognized inadequate performance of the left ventricular ejection fraction as a risk stratification tool. Consequently, the field has transitioned from a focus on the "high-risk ejection fraction" to the broader concept of the "high-risk patient". There are currently no effective means of stratifying SCD risk in patients with preserved EF, who constitute the majority (at least 70%) of all patients who will suffer SCD. Can the field be disrupted and novel predictors of SCD identified? In addition to the ongoing quest for identification of the high-risk patient early in the nature history of SCD, a new paradigm for preventing SCD in the "near-term", within several weeks of the lethal event, has been proposed. While rapid advances in technology, data warehousing and analysis will accelerate the process of enhancing SCD prediction and prevention; regulatory, funding and clinical implementation strategies will need to keep pace if these expectations are to be realized.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.