Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28364511›Full record

Trial reportSleep2017

Mid-Treatment Sleep Duration Predicts Clinically Significant Knee Osteoarthritis Pain reduction at 6 months: Effects From a Behavioral Sleep Medicine Clinical Trial.

Jessica K Salwen, Michael T Smith, Patrick H Finan

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Sleep, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Observational
  18. Observational
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Jessica K SalwenDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine,Baltimore, MD.
Michael T SmithDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine,Baltimore, MD.
Patrick H FinanDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine,Baltimore, MD.

Funding

Interdisciplinary Training in Biobehavioral Pain ResearchT32NS070201 · NINDS · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI DONG, XINZHONG, SMITH, MICHAEL T · 2010 to 2024
$3.6M
Sleep Disturbance, Central Pain Modulation, and Clinical Pain in OsteoarthritisR01AR054871 · NIAMS · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI SMITH, MICHAEL T · 2007 to 2011
$3.1M
Effects of Insomnia on Pain & Function in Osteoarthritis:The Role of InflammationR01AR059410 · NIAMS · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI SMITH, MICHAEL T · 2010 to 2013
$1.3M
Sleep disturbance as a putative mechanism for reward system dysfunctionK23DA035915 · NIDA · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI FINAN, PATRICK · 2014 to 2018
$838k
NIAMS NIH HHS R01 AR054871NIAMS NIH HHS R01 AR059410NIDA NIH HHS K23 DA035915NINDS NIH HHS T32 NS070201
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Study Objectives: To determine the relative influence of sleep continuity (sleep efficiency, sleep onset latency, total sleep time [TST], and wake after sleep onset) on clinical pain outcomes within a trial of cognitive behavioral therapy for insomnia (CBT-I) for patients with comorbid knee osteoarthritis and insomnia. Methods: Secondary analyses were performed on data from 74 patients with comorbid insomnia and knee osteoarthritis who completed a randomized clinical trial of 8-session multicomponent CBT-I versus an active behavioral desensitization control condition (BD), including a 6-month follow-up assessment. Data used herein include daily diaries of sleep parameters, actigraphy data, and self-report questionnaires administered at specific time points. Results: Patients who reported at least 30% improvement in self-reported pain from baseline to 6-month follow-up were considered responders (N = 31). Pain responders and nonresponders did not differ significantly at baseline across any sleep continuity measures. At mid-treatment, only TST predicted pain response via t tests and logistic regression, whereas other measures of sleep continuity were nonsignificant. Recursive partitioning analyses identified a minimum cut-point of 382 min of TST achieved at mid-treatment in order to best predict pain improvements 6-month posttreatment. Actigraphy results followed the same pattern as daily diary-based results. Conclusions: Clinically significant pain reductions in response to both CBT-I and BD were optimally predicted by achieving approximately 6.5 hr sleep duration by mid-treatment. Thus, tailoring interventions to increase TST early in treatment may be an effective strategy to promote long-term pain reductions. More comprehensive research on components of behavioral sleep medicine treatments that contribute to pain response is warranted.

Indexed as

Cognitive Behavioral TherapyActigraphyFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedOsteoarthritis, KneePainSelf ReportSleepSleep Initiation and Maintenance DisordersSurveys and QuestionnairesTime FactorsTreatment OutcomeCBT-Iinsomnia.osteoarthritispaintotal sleep time

Identifiers

PMID28364511
PMCPMC6251549

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.