Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28364415›Full record

Trial reportSleep2017

Using Oscillating Sounds to Manipulate Sleep Spindles.

James W Antony, Ken A Paller

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Sleep, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Neurophysiological effects of targeting sleep spindles with closed-loop auditory stimulation.Sleep advances : a journal of the Sleep Research Society · 2025
    Article
  6. Sleep Consolidation Potentiates Sensorimotor Adaptation.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. The Brain Selectively Tunes to Unfamiliar Voices during Sleep.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2022
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Sleep Spindles Preferentially Consolidate Weakly Encoded Memories.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2021
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

James W AntonyInterdepartmental Neuroscience Program, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL 60208.
Ken A PallerInterdepartmental Neuroscience Program, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL 60208.

Funding

SYNAPTIC SUBSTRATES OF AGE-DEPENDENT MEMORY DEFICITSR01AG017139 · NIA · NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY AT CHICAGO · PI DISTERHOFT, JOHN F · 1999 to 2013
$4.6M
Neuroscience in the Early Years: Predoctoral TrainingT32AG020418 · NIA · NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY AT CHICAGO · PI MUGNAINI, ENRICO · 2001 to 2010
$2.6M
Multivariate Pattern Analysis and Memory Reactivation During SleepF31MH100958 · NIMH · NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY · PI ANTONY, JAMES W · 2013 to 2015
$41k
NIA NIH HHS R01 AG017139NIA NIH HHS T32 AG020418NIMH NIH HHS F31 MH100958
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: EEG oscillations known as sleep spindles have been linked with various aspects of cognition, but the specific functions they signal remain controversial. Two types of EEG sleep spindles have been distinguished: slow spindles at 11-13.5 Hz and fast spindles at 13.5-16 Hz. Slow spindles exhibit a frontal scalp topography, whereas fast spindles exhibit a posterior scalp topography and have been preferentially linked with memory consolidation during sleep. To advance understanding beyond that provided from correlative studies of spindles, we aimed to develop a new method to systematically manipulate spindles. Aims and Methods: We presented repeating bursts of oscillating white noise to people during a 90-min afternoon nap. During stage 2 and slow-wave sleep, oscillations were embedded within contiguous 10-s stimulation intervals, each comprising 2 s of white noise amplitude modulated at 12 Hz (targeting slow spindles), 15 Hz (targeting fast spindles), or 50 Hz followed by 8 s of constant white noise. Results: During oscillating stimulation compared to constant stimulation, parietal EEG recordings showed more slow spindles in the 12-Hz condition, more fast spindles in the 15-Hz condition, and no change in the 50-Hz control condition. These effects were topographically selective, and were absent in frontopolar EEG recordings, where slow spindle density was highest. Spindles during stimulation were similar to spontaneous spindles in standard physiological features, including duration and scalp distribution. Conclusions: These results define a new method to selectively and noninvasively manipulate spindles through acoustic resonance, while also providing new evidence for functional distinctions between the 2 types of EEG spindles.

Indexed as

Acoustic StimulationAdolescentAdultBiological ClocksBrainElectroencephalographyFemaleHumansMaleScalpSleepSleep StagesSoundYoung Adultmemory consolidation.oscillationssleep spindles

Identifiers

PMID28364415
PMCPMC6084765

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.