ReviewZeitschrift fur Gerontologie und Geriatrie2017
[Geriatric assessment of patients with hematological neoplasms].
Review in Zeitschrift fur Gerontologie und Geriatrie, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Hematological malignancies are typical diseases of the elderly. The aging of the population in the Western World results in a significant increase in the number of elderly patients with hematological malignant diseases. This has important consequences for medicine. One consequence of this development is that the need for tools for the evaluation of both functional and global status of the elderly increases. The use of these tools enables the hematologist to better stratify the patients, to individualize therapy better, to possibly modify therapy in order to improve implementation of supportive measures and interventions, to minimize toxicity and side effects and ultimately to tailor the treatment to the individual patient. Several tools are available for geriatric assessment (GA) and there is strong evidence that an effective GA can detect previously unknown problems. The targeted intervention improves the prognosis and compliance of therapy in elderly patients with hematological malignant diseases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
28364257What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.