Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28364160›Full record

ReviewAngiogenesis2017

The clinical application of angiostatic therapy in combination with radiotherapy: past, present, future.

Lisanne C Hamming, Ben J Slotman, Henk M W Verheul, Victor L Thijssen

Open access · hybridAbstract readHistorical ArticleReview
In one paragraph

Review in Angiogenesis, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Engineered exosomes from different sources for cancer-targeted therapy.Signal transduction and targeted therapy · 2023
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Combination Therapies with PRRT.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Interfering with Tumor Hypoxia for Radiotherapy Optimization.Journal of experimental & clinical cancer research : CR · 2021
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Novel treatment planning approaches to enhance the therapeutic ratio: targeting the molecular mechanisms of radiation therapy.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2020
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Lisanne C HammingDepartment of Medical Oncology, VU University Medical Centre, De Boelelaan 1118, 1081 HV, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Ben J SlotmanDepartment of Radiation Oncology, VU University Medical Centre, De Boelelaan 1118, 1081 HV, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Henk M W VerheulDepartment of Medical Oncology, VU University Medical Centre, De Boelelaan 1118, 1081 HV, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Victor L ThijssenDepartment of Radiation Oncology, VU University Medical Centre, De Boelelaan 1118, 1081 HV, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. v.thijssen@vumc.nl.
Amsterdam UMC Location VUmc · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although monotherapy with angiostatic drugs is still far from effective, there is abundant evidence that angiostatic therapy can improve the efficacy of conventional treatments like radiotherapy. This has instigated numerous efforts to optimize and clinically implement the combination of angiostatic drugs with radiation treatment. The results from past and present clinical trials that explored this combination therapy indeed show encouraging results. However, current findings also show that the combination has variable efficacy and is associated with increased toxicity. This indicates that combining radiotherapy with angiostatic drugs not only holds opportunities but also provides several challenges. In the current review, we provide an update of the most recent insights from clinical trials that evaluated the combination of angiostatic drugs with radiation treatment. In addition, we discuss the outstanding questions for future studies in order to improve the clinical benefit of combining angiostatic therapy with radiation therapy.

Indexed as

Angiogenesis InhibitorsChemoradiotherapyClinical Trials as TopicHistory, 20th CenturyHistory, 21st CenturyHumansNeoplasmsNeovascularization, PathologicAngiogenesis InhibitorsAngiogenesisAngiostatic drugsCancerClinical trialsCombination therapyRadiation

Identifiers

PMID28364160
PMCPMC5437175
OpenAlexW2603839577

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.