Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28364152›Full record

ArticleSurgical endoscopy2017

Sleeve gastrectomy revision by endoluminal sleeve plication gastroplasty: a small pilot case series.

George Eid

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Surgical endoscopy, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Endoscopic therapy of weight regain after bariatric surgery.World journal of gastrointestinal surgery · 2021
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Bariatric surgery and the endoscopist.Frontline gastroenterology · 2021
    Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

George EidAllegheny Health Network, Temple University, 4727 Friendship Avenue, Suite 140, Pittsburgh, PA, 15224, USA. George.eid@ahn.org.
Temple University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe necessity for reoperation due to insufficient weight loss after bariatric surgery has led to a novel endoluminal plication of the gastric sleeve using a endoscopic suturing device. Advances in endoluminal endoscopy and other minimally invasive bariatric surgeries have inspired innovative techniques and have produced reliable suturing tools for gastric volume reduction.

methodsRetrospective pilot case series of 5 patients with an enlarged gastric sleeve.

resultsThe data show a sustained weight loss for all patients ranging from 19 to 36 lbs at 1 year, with the greatest average weight loss (27 lbs) observed at 6 months. At 1 year post-op, the mean body mass index was 33 kg/m

conclusionsThe endoluminal approach with an endoscopic suturing device for sleeve revision by plication is showing early promising results and expands the management of weight gain following laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy. This simple approach may offer a significant option for these patients as an interventional strategy in the early phases of weight regain, and prior to reaching a BMI of 40 kg/m

Indexed as

Endoscopy, GastrointestinalAgedFemaleGastrectomyGastroplastyHumansLaparoscopyMaleMiddle AgedPilot ProjectsReoperationRetrospective StudiesEndoluminalEndoscopicEndoscopic plicationSleeve gastrectomySleeve revisionWeight gain

Identifiers

PMID28364152
OpenAlexW2599243998

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.