Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28364035›Full record

ArticleG3 (Bethesda, Md.)2017

Distinct Patterns of Gene Gain and Loss: Diverse Evolutionary Modes of NBS-Encoding Genes in Three Solanaceae Crop Species.

Lan-Hua Qian, Guang-Can Zhou, Xiao-Qin Sun, Zhao Lei, Yan-Mei Zhang, Jia-Yu Xue, Yue-Yu Hang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in G3 (Bethesda, Md.), 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Genome-wide characterization of theFrontiers in genetics · 2022
    Article
  9. Genome-Wide Analysis ofFrontiers in genetics · 2022
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Evolution ofFrontiers in plant science · 2021
    Article
  16. Identification and Characterization ofFrontiers in plant science · 2021
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Lan-Hua QianSuzhou Polytechnic Institute of Agriculture, 215008, China.
Guang-Can ZhouResearch Center of Plant Diversity and Systematic Evolution, Institute of Botany, Jiangsu Province and Chinese Academy of Sciences, Nanjing 210014, China.
Xiao-Qin SunResearch Center of Plant Diversity and Systematic Evolution, Institute of Botany, Jiangsu Province and Chinese Academy of Sciences, Nanjing 210014, China.
Zhao LeiResearch Center of Plant Diversity and Systematic Evolution, Institute of Botany, Jiangsu Province and Chinese Academy of Sciences, Nanjing 210014, China.
Yan-Mei ZhangResearch Center of Plant Diversity and Systematic Evolution, Institute of Botany, Jiangsu Province and Chinese Academy of Sciences, Nanjing 210014, China.
Jia-Yu XueResearch Center of Plant Diversity and Systematic Evolution, Institute of Botany, Jiangsu Province and Chinese Academy of Sciences, Nanjing 210014, China xuejy@cnbg.net hangyueyu@cnbg.net.
Yue-Yu HangResearch Center of Plant Diversity and Systematic Evolution, Institute of Botany, Jiangsu Province and Chinese Academy of Sciences, Nanjing 210014, China xuejy@cnbg.net hangyueyu@cnbg.net.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Plant resistance conferred by nucleotide binding site (NBS)-encoding resistance genes plays a key role in the defense against various pathogens throughout the entire plant life cycle. However, comparative analyses for the systematic evaluation and determination of the evolutionary modes of NBS-encoding genes among Solanaceae species are rare. In this study, 447, 255, and 306 NBS-encoding genes were identified from the genomes of potato, tomato, and pepper, respectively. These genes usually clustered as tandem arrays on chromosomes; few existed as singletons. Phylogenetic analysis indicated that three subclasses [TNLs (TIR-NBS-LRR), CNLs (CC-NBS-LRR), and RNLs (RPW8-NBS-LRR)] each formed a monophyletic clade and were distinguished by unique exon/intron structures and amino acid motif sequences. By comparing phylogenetic and systematic relationships, we inferred that the NBS-encoding genes in the present genomes of potato, tomato, and pepper were derived from 150 CNL, 22 TNL, and 4 RNL ancestral genes, and underwent independent gene loss and duplication events after speciation. The NBS-encoding genes therefore exhibit diverse and dynamic evolutionary patterns in the three Solanaceae species, giving rise to the discrepant gene numbers observed today. Potato shows a "consistent expansion" pattern, tomato exhibits a pattern of "first expansion and then contraction," and pepper presents a "shrinking" pattern. The earlier expansion of CNLs in the common ancestor led to the dominance of this subclass in gene numbers. However, RNLs remained at low copy numbers due to their specific functions. Along the evolutionary process of NBS-encoding genes in Solanaceae, species-specific tandem duplications contributed the most to gene expansions.

Indexed as

Evolution, MolecularGain of Function MutationModels, GeneticBinding SitesGenetic SpeciationLoss of Function MutationNucleotidesPhylogenyPlant ProteinsProtein BindingSolanaceaeNucleotidesPlant Proteinsevolutionary patternNBS-encoding genesphylogenetic relationshipSolanaceae

Identifiers

PMID28364035
PMCPMC5427506

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.