Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28364015›Full record

ReviewClinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research2017

Clinically Relevant Concentrations of Anticancer Drugs: A Guide for Nonclinical Studies.

Dane R Liston, Myrtle Davis

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 235 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
235citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

235 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. 'AnbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  12. Cancer Chemoimmunotherapy: Time Will Tell.Cancer immunology research · 2026
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article

175 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Dane R ListonDivision of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, Developmental Therapeutics Program, Toxicology and Pharmacology Branch, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland. dane.liston@nih.gov.
Myrtle DavisDivision of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, Developmental Therapeutics Program, Toxicology and Pharmacology Branch, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland.

Funding

Intramural NIH HHS Z99 CA999999
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Approved and marketed drugs are frequently studied in nonclinical models to evaluate the potential application to additional disease indications or to gain insight about molecular mechanisms of action. A survey of the literature reveals that nonclinical experimental designs (

Indexed as

Dose-Response Relationship, DrugAntineoplastic AgentsHumansMedical OncologyNeoplasmsUnited StatesUnited States Food and Drug AdministrationAntineoplastic Agents

Identifiers

PMID28364015
PMCPMC5511563

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.