Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28363467›Full record

ArticleBiophysical chemistry2017

Investigation of the electrostatic and hydration properties of DNA minor groove-binding by a heterocyclic diamidine by osmotic pressure.

Noa Erlitzki, Kenneth Huang, Suela Xhani, Abdelbasset A Farahat, Arvind Kumar, David W Boykin, Gregory M K Poon

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biophysical chemistry, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. CoInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2018
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Noa ErlitzkiDepartment of Chemistry, Georgia State University, Atlanta, GA 30303, United States.
Kenneth HuangDepartment of Chemistry, Georgia State University, Atlanta, GA 30303, United States.
Suela XhaniDepartment of Chemistry, Georgia State University, Atlanta, GA 30303, United States.
Abdelbasset A FarahatDepartment of Chemistry, Georgia State University, Atlanta, GA 30303, United States; Department of Pharmaceutical Organic Chemistry, Faculty of Pharmacy, Mansoura University, Mansoura, Egypt.
Arvind KumarDepartment of Chemistry, Georgia State University, Atlanta, GA 30303, United States.
David W BoykinDepartment of Chemistry, Georgia State University, Atlanta, GA 30303, United States.
Gregory M K PoonDepartment of Chemistry, Georgia State University, Atlanta, GA 30303, United States; Center for Diagnostics and Therapeutics, Georgia State University, Atlanta, GA 30303, United States. Electronic address: gpoon@gsu.edu.

Funding

Georgia State University Initiative for Maximizing Student DevelopmentR25GM109442 · NIGMS · GEORGIA STATE UNIVERSITY · PI COX, DANIEL N, FRANTZ, KYLE J. · 2016 to 2020
$1.0M
Direct activation of hematopoietic transcription factorsR21HL129063 · NHLBI · GEORGIA STATE UNIVERSITY · PI POON, GREGORY MAN KAI · 2015 to 2016
$415k
NHLBI NIH HHS R21 HL129063NIGMS NIH HHS R25 GM109442
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Previous investigations of sequence-specific DNA binding by model minor groove-binding compounds showed that the ligand/DNA complex was destabilized in the presence of compatible co-solutes. Inhibition was interpreted in terms of osmotic stress theory as the uptake of significant numbers of excess water molecules from bulk solvent upon complex formation. Here, we interrogated the AT-specific DNA complex formed with the symmetric heterocyclic diamidine DB1976 as a model for minor groove DNA recognition using both ionic (NaCl) and non-ionic cosolutes (ethylene glycol, glycine betaine, maltose, nicotinamide, urea). While the non-ionic cosolutes all destabilized the ligand/DNA complex, their quantitative effects were heterogeneous in a cosolute- and salt-dependent manner. Perturbation with NaCl in the absence of non-ionic cosolute showed that preferential hydration water was released upon formation of the DB1976/DNA complex. As salt probes counter-ion release from charged groups such as the DNA backbone, we propose that the preferential hydration uptake in DB1976/DNA binding observed in the presence of osmolytes reflects the exchange of preferentially bound cosolute with hydration water in the environs of the bound DNA, rather than a net uptake of hydration waters by the complex.

Indexed as

DNAMolecular Dynamics SimulationOsmotic PressurePentamidineSodium ChlorideStatic ElectricityThermodynamicsWaterDNAPentamidineSodium ChlorideWaterCo-soluteDrug/DNA interactionsHeterocyclic dicationsMolecular hydrationOsmotic pressureWyman linkages

Identifiers

PMID28363467
PMCPMC5607081

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.