ReviewThe journal of allergy and clinical immunology. In practice
Eosinophilic Esophagitis: A Primary Disease of the Esophageal Mucosa.
Review in The journal of allergy and clinical immunology. In practice. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- A multi-omic analysis reveals the esophageal dysbiosis as the predominant trait of eosinophilic esophagitis.Journal of translational medicine · 2023Article
- Viral Induced Effects on a Vulnerable Epithelium; Lessons Learned From Paediatric Asthma and Eosinophilic Oesophagitis.Frontiers in immunology · 2021Review
- The role of eosinophils in immunotherapy.Current opinion in allergy and clinical immunology · 2020Article
- The Role of Eosinophils in Immunotherapy.Current allergy and asthma reports · 2020Review
- Assessing the Risk Factors for Refractory Eosinophilic Esophagitis in Children and Adults.Gastroenterology research and practice · 2019Article
- An algorithm for the classification of mRNA patterns in eosinophilic esophagitis: Integration of machine learning.The Journal of allergy and clinical immunology · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.