Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28362843›Full record

Trial reportPloS one2017

The (non-)replicability of regulatory resource depletion: A field report employing non-invasive brain stimulation.

Franziska Emmerling, Carolien Martijn, Hugo J E M Alberts, Alix C Thomson, Bastian David, Daniel Kessler, Teresa Schuhmann, Alexander T Sack

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in PloS one, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Franziska EmmerlingDepartment of Cognitive Neuroscience, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7350-7473
Carolien MartijnDepartment of Clinical Psychological Science, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Hugo J E M AlbertsDepartment of Clinical Psychological Science, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Alix C ThomsonDepartment of Cognitive Neuroscience, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Bastian DavidCenter for Economics and Neuroscience, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
Daniel KesslerDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, United States of America.
Teresa SchuhmannDepartment of Cognitive Neuroscience, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Alexander T SackDepartment of Cognitive Neuroscience, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cognitive effort and self-control are exhausting. Although evidence is ambiguous, behavioural studies have repeatedly suggested that control-demanding tasks seem to deplete a limited cache of self-regulatory resources leading to performance degradations and fatigue. While resource depletion has indirectly been associated with a decline in right prefrontal cortex capacity, its precise neural underpinnings have not yet been revealed. This study consisted of two independent experiments, which set out to investigate the causal role of the right dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) in a classic dual phase depletion paradigm employing non-invasive brain stimulation. In Experiment 1 we demonstrated a general depletion effect, which was significantly eliminated by anodal transcranial Direct Current Stimulation to the right DLPFC. In Experiment 2, however, we failed to replicate the basic psychological depletion effect within a second independent sample. The dissimilar results are discussed in the context of the current 'replication crisis' and suggestions for future studies are offered. While our current results do not allow us to firmly argue for or against the existence of resource depletion, we outline why it is crucial to further clarify which specific external and internal circumstances lead to limited replicability of the described effect. We showcase and discuss the current inter-lab replication problem based on two independent samples tested within one research group (intra-lab).

Indexed as

Transcranial Direct Current StimulationAdultDeep Brain StimulationFemaleHumansMalePrefrontal CortexReaction TimeSurveys and QuestionnairesYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID28362843
PMCPMC5376079

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.