Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28362810›Full record

ArticlePloS one2017

A comparison of sampling methods for examining the laryngeal microbiome.

Alissa S Hanshew, Marie E Jetté, Stephanie Tadayon, Susan L Thibeault

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 41% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Primary ciliary dyskinesia in Volendam: Diagnostic and phenotypic features in patients with a CCDC114 mutation.American journal of medical genetics. Part C, Seminars in medical genetics · 2022
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Alissa S HanshewDepartment of Surgery, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, Wisconsin, United States of America.
Marie E JettéDepartment of Surgery, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, Wisconsin, United States of America.
Stephanie TadayonDepartment of Surgery, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, Wisconsin, United States of America.
Susan L ThibeaultDepartment of Surgery, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, Wisconsin, United States of America.
University of Wisconsin–Madison · USPennsylvania State University · USUniversity of Colorado Denver · US

Funding

University of Wisconsin Voice Research Training Program (T32)T32DC009401 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI Susan Lynn Thibeault · 2009 to 2026
$6.3M
NIDCD NIH HHS T32 DC009401
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Shifts in healthy human microbial communities have now been linked to disease in numerous body sites. Noninvasive swabbing remains the sampling technique of choice in most locations; however, it is not well known if this method samples the entire community, or only those members that are easily removed from the surface. We sought to compare the communities found via swabbing and biopsied tissue in true vocal folds, a location that is difficult to sample without causing potential damage and impairment to tissue function. A secondary aim of this study was to determine if swab sampling of the false vocal folds could be used as proxy for true vocal folds. True and false vocal fold mucosal samples (swabbed and biopsied) were collected from six pigs and used for 454 pyrosequencing of the V3-V5 region of the 16S rRNA gene. Most of the alpha and beta measures of diversity were found to be significantly similar between swabbed and biopsied tissue samples. Similarly, the communities found in true and false vocal folds did not differ considerably. These results suggest that samples taken via swabs are sufficient to assess the community, and that samples taken from the false vocal folds may be used as proxies for the true vocal folds. Assessment of these techniques opens an avenue to less traumatic means to explore the role microbes play in the development of diseases of the vocal folds, and perhaps the rest of the respiratory tract.

Indexed as

AnimalsLarynxMucous MembranePolymerase Chain ReactionRNA, Ribosomal, 16SSwineVocal CordsRNA, Ribosomal, 16S

Identifiers

PMID28362810
PMCPMC5375147
OpenAlexW2598029673

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.