ArticlePLoS computational biology2017
Interrogating the topological robustness of gene regulatory circuits by randomization.
Article in PLoS computational biology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 110 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
110 citing papers in PubMed.
- PROFET predicts continuous gene expression dynamics from scRNA-seq data to elucidate heterogeneity of cancer treatment responses.Cell systems · 2026Article
- Travelling Waves in Gene Expression: A Mathematical Model of Cell-State Dynamics in Melanoma.Bulletin of mathematical biology · 2026Article
- Inferring stochastic dynamics by biophysical Neural ODE using single-cell transcriptomics.Nature communications · 2026Article
- Dissecting reversible and irreversible single cell state transitions from gene regulatory networks.Molecular systems biology · 2026Article
- Rewiring miR-22/SNAI1 via CRISPR-based edge editing destabilizes the epithelial phenotype.NPJ systems biology and applications · 2026Article
- Network hypermotifs in biological systems: structure, dynamics, and functional implications.NPJ systems biology and applications · 2026Review
- Incoherent feedforward loop dominates the robustness and tunability of necroptosis biphasic, emergent, and coexistent dynamics.Fundamental research · 2026Article
- Regulatory network and spatial modeling reveal cooperative mechanisms of resistance and immune escape in ER+ breast cancer.BMC cancer · 2026Article
- sRACIPE 2.0: a systems biology circuit modeling toolkit for random circuit perturbation.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2026Article
- Gain of function p53 mutant R273H confers distinct methylation profiles and consequent YAP/TAZ signaling mediated activation of partial or full EMT states to colon tumours.Epigenetics & chromatin · 2025Article
- A computational approach for perturbation-induced EMT transitions.NPJ systems biology and applications · 2025Article
- GRiNS: a python library for simulating gene regulatory network dynamics.BMC bioinformatics · 2025Article
- Regulatory network and spatial modeling reveal cooperative mechanisms of resistance and immune escape in ER+ breast cancer.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Role of frustrations in cell reprogramming.PNAS nexus · 2025Article
- Gene regulatory network inference during cell fate decisions by perturbation strategies.NPJ systems biology and applications · 2025Article
- Low dimensionality of phenotypic space as an emergent property of coordinated teams in biological regulatory networks.iScience · 2025Article
- Operating principles of interconnected feedback loops driving cell fate transitions.NPJ systems biology and applications · 2025Article
- Endosomal pH is an evolutionarily conserved driver of phenotypic plasticity in colorectal cancer.NPJ systems biology and applications · 2024Article
- General relationship of local topologies, global dynamics, and bifurcation in cellular networks.NPJ systems biology and applications · 2024Article
- Energy Landscape Reveals the Underlying Mechanism of Cancer-Adipose Conversion in Gene Network Models.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2024Article
50 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
One of the most important roles of cells is performing their cellular tasks properly for survival. Cells usually achieve robust functionality, for example, cell-fate decision-making and signal transduction, through multiple layers of regulation involving many genes. Despite the combinatorial complexity of gene regulation, its quantitative behavior has been typically studied on the basis of experimentally verified core gene regulatory circuitry, composed of a small set of important elements. It is still unclear how such a core circuit operates in the presence of many other regulatory molecules and in a crowded and noisy cellular environment. Here we report a new computational method, named random circuit perturbation (RACIPE), for interrogating the robust dynamical behavior of a gene regulatory circuit even without accurate measurements of circuit kinetic parameters. RACIPE generates an ensemble of random kinetic models corresponding to a fixed circuit topology, and utilizes statistical tools to identify generic properties of the circuit. By applying RACIPE to simple toggle-switch-like motifs, we observed that the stable states of all models converge to experimentally observed gene state clusters even when the parameters are strongly perturbed. RACIPE was further applied to a proposed 22-gene network of the Epithelial-to-Mesenchymal Transition (EMT), from which we identified four experimentally observed gene states, including the states that are associated with two different types of hybrid Epithelial/Mesenchymal phenotypes. Our results suggest that dynamics of a gene circuit is mainly determined by its topology, not by detailed circuit parameters. Our work provides a theoretical foundation for circuit-based systems biology modeling. We anticipate RACIPE to be a powerful tool to predict and decode circuit design principles in an unbiased manner, and to quantitatively evaluate the robustness and heterogeneity of gene expression.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.