Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28362643›Full record

ArticleCritical care medicine2017

Simulation of a Novel Schedule for Intensivist Staffing to Improve Continuity of Patient Care and Reduce Physician Burnout.

Alon Geva, Christopher P Landrigan, Meredith G van der Velden, Adrienne G Randolph

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Critical care medicine, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Shared Decision-Making in Acute Pain Services.Current pain and headache reports · 2023
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Alon Geva1Division of Critical Care Medicine, Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative, and Pain Medicine, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, MA.2Computational Health Informatics Program, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, MA.3Department of Anaesthesia, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA.4Division of General Pediatrics, Department of Medicine, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, MA.5Division of Sleep Medicine, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA.6Department of Pediatrics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA.
Christopher P Landrigan
Meredith G van der Velden
Adrienne G Randolph
Harvard University · US

Funding

RESEARCH TRAINING IN PEDIATRIC EMERGENCY MEDICINET32HD040128 · NICHD · CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL BOSTON · PI Kenneth D. Mandl · 2001 to 2026
$5.0M
NICHD NIH HHS T32 HD040128
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveDespite widespread adoption of in-house call for ICU attendings, there is a paucity of research on optimal scheduling of intensivists to provide continuous on-site coverage. Overnight call duties have traditionally been added onto 7 days of continuous daytime clinical service. We designed an alternative ICU staffing model to increase continuity of attending physician care for patients while also decreasing interruptions to attendings' nonclinical weeks.

designComputer-based simulation of a 1-year schedule.

settingA simulated ICU divided into two daytime teams each covered by a different attending and both covered by one overnight on-call attending. SUBJECTS: Simulated patients were randomly admitted on different service days to assess continuity of care.

interventionsA "shared service schedule" was compared to a standard "7 days on schedule." For the 7 days on schedule, an attending covered a team for 7 consecutive days and off-service attendings cross-covered each night. For the shared schedule, four attendings shared the majority of daytime and nighttime service for two teams over 2 weeks, with recovery periods built into the scheduled service time. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN

resultsContinuity of care as measured by the Continuity of Attending Physician Index increased by 9% with the shared schedule. Annually, the shared service schedule was predicted to increase free weekends by 3.4 full weekends and 1.3 weekends with either Saturday or Sunday off. Full weeks without clinical obligations increased by 4 weeks. Mean time between clinical obligations increased by 5.8 days.

conclusionsA shared service schedule is predicted to improve continuity of care while increasing free weekends and continuity of uninterrupted nonclinical weeks for attendings. Computer-based simulation allows assessment of benefits and tradeoffs of the alternative schedule without disturbing existing clinical systems.

Indexed as

Burnout, ProfessionalComputer SimulationContinuity of Patient CareHumansIntensive Care UnitsMedical Staff, HospitalPersonnel Staffing and SchedulingRandom Allocation

Identifiers

PMID28362643
PMCPMC5474184
OpenAlexW2601704228

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.