Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28362576›Full record

ArticleeLife2017

Ambra1 spatially regulates Src activity and Src/FAK-mediated cancer cell invasion via trafficking networks.

Christina Schoenherr, Adam Byron, Emma Sandilands, Ketevan Paliashvili, George S Baillie, Amaya Garcia-Munoz, Cristina Valacca, Francesco Cecconi, Bryan Serrels, Margaret C Frame

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in eLife, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 39 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Ambra1 in cancer: implications for clinical oncology.Apoptosis : an international journal on programmed cell death · 2022
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Mitophagy in tumorigenesis and metastasis.Cellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS · 2021
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 5 institutions in 4 countries.

Christina SchoenherrCancer Research United Kingdom Edinburgh Centre, Institute of Genetics and Molecular Medicine, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-0983-6168
Adam ByronCancer Research United Kingdom Edinburgh Centre, Institute of Genetics and Molecular Medicine, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-5939-9883
Emma SandilandsCancer Research United Kingdom Edinburgh Centre, Institute of Genetics and Molecular Medicine, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.
Ketevan PaliashviliCentre for Nephrology, Division of Medicine, Royal Free Hospital Campus, London, United Kingdom.
George S BaillieInstitute of Cardiovascular and Medical Science, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom.
Amaya Garcia-MunozSystem Biology Ireland, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.
Cristina ValaccaDepartment of Biology, University of Tor Vergata, Via della Ricerca Scientifica, Rome, Italy.
Francesco CecconiDepartment of Biology, University of Tor Vergata, Via della Ricerca Scientifica, Rome, Italy.
Bryan SerrelsCancer Research United Kingdom Edinburgh Centre, Institute of Genetics and Molecular Medicine, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.
Margaret C FrameCancer Research United Kingdom Edinburgh Centre, Institute of Genetics and Molecular Medicine, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-5882-1942
Edinburgh Cancer Research · GBUniversity of Rome Tor Vergata · ITThe Royal Free Hospital · GBUniversity College Dublin · IEUniversity of Glasgow · GB

Funding

Cancer Research UK 15703Cancer Research UK C157/A15703European Research Council 294440
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Here, using mouse squamous cell carcinoma cells, we report a completely new function for the autophagy protein Ambra1 as the first described 'spatial rheostat' controlling the Src/FAK pathway. Ambra1 regulates the targeting of active phospho-Src away from focal adhesions into autophagic structures that cancer cells use to survive adhesion stress. Ambra1 binds to both FAK and Src in cancer cells. When FAK is present, Ambra1 is recruited to focal adhesions, promoting FAK-regulated cancer cell direction-sensing and invasion. However, when Ambra1 cannot bind to FAK, abnormally high levels of phospho-Src and phospho-FAK accumulate at focal adhesions, positively regulating adhesion and invasive migration. Spatial control of active Src requires the trafficking proteins Dynactin one and IFITM3, which we identified as Ambra1 binding partners by interaction proteomics. We conclude that Ambra1 is a core component of an intracellular trafficking network linked to tight spatial control of active Src and FAK levels, and so crucially regulates their cancer-associated biological outputs.

Indexed as

Cell AdhesionCell MovementAdaptor Proteins, Signal TransducingAnimalsCarcinoma, Squamous CellCell Line, TumorDynactin ComplexFocal Adhesion Kinase 1Membrane ProteinsMicesrc-Family KinasesAdaptor Proteins, Signal TransducingAmbra1 protein, mouseDynactin ComplexFocal Adhesion Kinase 1fragilis protein, mouseMembrane ProteinsPtk2 protein, mousesrc-Family KinasesAmbra1cancer biologycell biologyFAKIFITM3invasionmouseSrctrafficking

Identifiers

PMID28362576
PMCPMC5376188
OpenAlexW2603962019

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.