Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28362563›Full record

Trial reportHuman vaccines & immunotherapeutics2017

Immunogenicity and safety of a novel MMR vaccine (live, freeze-dried) containing the Edmonston-Zagreb measles strain, the Hoshino mumps strain, and the RA 27/3 rubella strain: Results of a randomized, comparative, active controlled phase III clinical trial.

Ashwani Sood, Monjori Mitra, Himanshu Arvind Joshi, Uma Siddhartha Nayak, Prashanth Siddaiah, T Ramesh Babu, Samarendra Mahapatro, Jayesh Sanmukhani, Gaurav Gupta, Ravindra Mittal and 1 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIIComparative StudyMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Close the gap for routine mumps vaccination in Japan.Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics · 2021
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Observational
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 8 institutions in 1 country.

Ashwani Sooda Department of Paediatrics , Indira Gandhi Medical College Shimla , Himachal Pradesh , India.
Monjori Mitrab Institute of Child Health , Kolkata , West Bengal , India.
Himanshu Arvind Joshic Department of Paediatrics , GMERS Medical College and General Hospital, Sola , Ahmedabad , Gujarat , India.
Uma Siddhartha Nayakd Department of Pediatrics , GMERS Medical College & General Hospital, Gotri , Vadodara , Gujarat , India.
Prashanth Siddaiahe Department of Pediatrics , Mysore Medical College and Research Institute and Associated Hospitals , Mysore , Karnataka , India.
T Ramesh Babuf Department of Pediatrics , Gandhi General Hospital, Musheerabad , Secunderabad , Telangana , India.
Samarendra Mahapatrog Department of Pediatrics , Hi-Tech Medical College & Hospital, Health Park , Pandara , Bhubaneswar , India.
Jayesh Sanmukhanih Department of Clinical Research and Regulatory Affairs , Cadila Healthcare Limited , India.ORCID 0000-0003-4663-4431
Gaurav Guptai Department of Virology and Biotechnology , Vaccine Technology Centre, Cadila Healthcare Limited , India.
Ravindra Mittalj Department of Clinical Research and Regulatory Affairs , Cadila Healthcare Limited , India.
Reinhard Glueckk Vaccine Technology Centre , Cadila Healthcare Limited , India.
Cadila Healthcare (India) · INB.J. Medical College · INGandhi Medical College & Hospital · INHi-Tech Medical College & Hospital · INIndira Gandhi Medical College · INInstitute of Child Health · INMysore Medical College · INSir Sayajirao General Hospital Medical College · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This phase III clinical trial was conducted to evaluate the immunogenicity and safety of the single-dose and multi-dose formulations of a novel MMR vaccine (live, freeze-dried) developed by M/s Cadila Healthcare Limited, India (Cadila MMR vaccine), containing the Hoshino mumps strain, compared to that of an existing MMR vaccine (live, freeze-dried) developed by M/s Serum Institute of India Limited, India (Serum MMR vaccine). These two vaccines have similar measles and rubella strains, but different mumps strains (Hoshino in Cadila MMR vaccine, and L-Zagreb in Serum MMR vaccine). Three hundred and twenty-eight subjects of either sex, aged 15-18 months, were randomized in a 2:1 ratio to receive either the Cadila or Serum MMR vaccine. Immunogenicity assessments (IgG antibodies against measles, mumps, and rubella viruses) were done at baseline and 42 d after vaccination. Solicited (local and systemic) and unsolicited adverse events were recorded for up to 42 d following vaccination. The Cadila MMR vaccine was found to be non-inferior to the Serum MMR vaccine in terms of end-of-study proportion of subjects seropositive for anti-measles antibodies (100.0% in both groups), anti-mumps antibodies (94.5% vs. 94.0%), and anti-rubella antibodies (95.5% vs. 91.0%). Both vaccines were well tolerated by all study participants; the most common adverse event reported in both groups was fever, followed by rash. The results of this phase III clinical trial show that the novel Cadila MMR vaccine is non-inferior to the Serum MMR vaccine.

Indexed as

Antibodies, ViralDrug-Related Side Effects and Adverse ReactionsFemaleHumansImmunoglobulin GInfantMaleMeasles-Mumps-Rubella VaccineMeasles virusMumps virusRubella virusVaccines, AttenuatedAntibodies, ViralImmunoglobulin GMeasles-Mumps-Rubella VaccineVaccines, AttenuatedCadila Healthcare LimitedHoshino mumps strainimmunogenicitymeaslesMMR vaccinemumpsnovel vaccinerubellaSerum Institute of India limited

Identifiers

PMID28362563
PMCPMC5512778
OpenAlexW2599983054

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.