Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28362086›Full record

ArticleBiochemistry2017

Caging and Photoactivation in Single-Molecule Förster Resonance Energy Transfer Experiments.

Atieh Aminian Jazi, Evelyn Ploetz, Muhamad Arizki, Balasubramaniam Dhandayuthapani, Izabela Waclawska, Reinhard Krämer, Christine Ziegler, Thorben Cordes

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biochemistry, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Single-Molecule FRET of Membrane Transport Proteins.Chembiochem : a European journal of chemical biology · 2021
    Review
  3. Molecular and Spectroscopic Characterization of Green and Red Cyanine Fluorophores from the Alexa Fluor and AF Series*.Chemphyschem : a European journal of chemical physics and physical chemistry · 2021
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Atieh Aminian JaziMolecular Microscopy Research Group, Zernike Institute for Advanced Materials, University of Groningen , Nijenborgh 4, 9747 AG Groningen, The Netherlands.
Evelyn PloetzMolecular Microscopy Research Group, Zernike Institute for Advanced Materials, University of Groningen , Nijenborgh 4, 9747 AG Groningen, The Netherlands.
Muhamad ArizkiMolecular Microscopy Research Group, Zernike Institute for Advanced Materials, University of Groningen , Nijenborgh 4, 9747 AG Groningen, The Netherlands.
Balasubramaniam DhandayuthapaniInstitute of Biophysics and Biophysical Chemistry, Universität Regensburg , 95053 Regensburg, Germany.
Izabela WaclawskaInstitute of Biophysics and Biophysical Chemistry, Universität Regensburg , 95053 Regensburg, Germany.
Reinhard KrämerInstitute for Biochemistry, Universität Köln , 50674 Köln, Germany.
Christine ZieglerInstitute of Biophysics and Biophysical Chemistry, Universität Regensburg , 95053 Regensburg, Germany.
Thorben CordesMolecular Microscopy Research Group, Zernike Institute for Advanced Materials, University of Groningen , Nijenborgh 4, 9747 AG Groningen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-8598-5499

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Caged organic fluorophores are established tools for localization-based super-resolution imaging. Their use relies on reversible deactivation of standard organic fluorophores by chemical reduction or commercially available caged dyes with ON switching of the fluorescent signal by ultraviolet (UV) light. Here, we establish caging of cyanine fluorophores and caged rhodamine dyes, i.e., chemical deactivation of fluorescence, for single-molecule Förster resonance energy transfer (smFRET) experiments with freely diffusing molecules. They allow temporal separation and sorting of multiple intramolecular donor-acceptor pairs during solution-based smFRET. We use this "caged FRET" methodology for the study of complex biochemical species such as multisubunit proteins or nucleic acids containing more than two fluorescent labels. Proof-of-principle experiments and a characterization of the uncaging process in the confocal volume are presented. These reveal that chemical caging and UV reactivation allow temporal uncoupling of convoluted fluorescence signals from, e.g., multiple spectrally similar donor or acceptor molecules on nucleic acids. We also use caging without UV reactivation to remove unwanted overlabeled species in experiments with the homotrimeric membrane transporter BetP. We finally outline further possible applications of the caged FRET methodology, such as the study of weak biochemical interactions, which are otherwise impossible with diffusion-based smFRET techniques because of the required low concentrations of fluorescently labeled biomolecules.

Indexed as

Bacterial ProteinsBase SequenceCarbocyaninesDiffusionEscherichia coliFluorescence Resonance Energy TransferFluorescent DyesGene ExpressionKineticsLightOligonucleotidesOxidation-ReductionPhosphinesPhotochemical ProcessesRecombinant ProteinsRhodaminesBacterial ProteinsBetP protein, Corynebacterium glutamicumCarbocyaninesFluorescent DyesOligonucleotidesPhosphinesRecombinant ProteinsRhodaminesSymporterstris(2-carboxyethyl)phosphine

Identifiers

PMID28362086
PMCPMC5390306

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.