Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28361837›Full record

ReviewSaudi journal of gastroenterology : official journal of the Saudi Gastroenterology Association

Early squamous neoplasia of the esophagus: The endoscopic approach to diagnosis and management.

Kesavan Kandiah, Fergus J Q Chedgy, Sharmila Subramaniam, Sreedhari Thayalasekaran, Arun Kurup, Pradeep Bhandari

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Saudi journal of gastroenterology : official journal of the Saudi Gastroenterology Association. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Novel milestones for early esophageal carcinoma: From bench to bed.World journal of gastrointestinal oncology · 2024
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Role of endoscopic therapy in early esophageal cancer.World journal of gastroenterology · 2018
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Kesavan KandiahDepartment of Gastroenterology, Queen Alexandria Hospital, Portsmouth, United Kingdom.
Fergus J Q ChedgyDepartment of Gastroenterology, Queen Alexandria Hospital, Portsmouth, United Kingdom.
Sharmila SubramaniamDepartment of Gastroenterology, Queen Alexandria Hospital, Portsmouth, United Kingdom.
Sreedhari ThayalasekaranDepartment of Gastroenterology, Queen Alexandria Hospital, Portsmouth, United Kingdom.
Arun KurupDepartment of Gastroenterology, Queen Alexandria Hospital, Portsmouth, United Kingdom.
Pradeep BhandariDepartment of Gastroenterology, Queen Alexandria Hospital, Portsmouth, United Kingdom.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Considerable focus has been placed on esophageal adenocarcinoma in the last 10 years because of its rising incidence in the West. However, squamous cell cancer (SCC) continues to be the most common type of esophageal cancer in the rest of the world. The detection of esophageal SCC (ESCC) in its early stages can lead to early endoscopic resection and cure. The increased incidence of ESCC in high-risk groups, such as patients with head and neck squamous cancers, highlights the need for screening programs. Lugol's iodine chromoendoscopy remains the gold standard technique in detecting early ESCC, however, safer techniques such as electronic enhancement or virtual chromoendoscopy would be ideal. In addition to early detection, these new "push-button" technological advancements can help characterize early ESCC, thereby further aiding the diagnostic accuracy and facilitating resection. Endoscopic resection (ER) of early ESCC with negligible risk of lymph node metastases has been widely accepted as an effective therapeutic strategy because it offers similar success rates when compared to esophagectomy, but carries lesser morbidity and mortality. Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is the preferred technique of ER in lesions larger than 15 mm because it provides higher rates of en bloc resections and lower local recurrence rates when compared to endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR).

Indexed as

AdenocarcinomaCarcinoma, Squamous CellEarly Detection of CancerEndoscopic Mucosal ResectionEndoscopy, Digestive SystemEsophageal NeoplasmsEsophagectomyHumansIncidenceTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID28361837
PMCPMC5385721

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.