ArticleBMC genomics2017
Sparse feature selection for classification and prediction of metastasis in endometrial cancer.
Article in BMC genomics, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Predictive models for lymph node metastasis in endometrial cancer: A systematic review and bibliometric analysis.Women's health (London, England)Pooled it
- Potential Regulation ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2025Article
- Review
- Controversy on Positive Peritoneal Cytology of Endometrial Carcinoma.Computational and mathematical methods in medicine · 2022Review
- Non-Coding RNAs as Prognostic Markers for Endometrial Cancer.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021Review
- Article
- Machine learning and deep learning methods that use omics data for metastasis prediction.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2021Review
- Prediction of tumour pathological subtype from genomic profile using sparse logistic regression with random effects.Journal of applied statistics · 2021Article
- Feature selection algorithm based on dual correlation filters for cancer-associated somatic variants.BMC bioinformatics · 2020Article
- Non-Coding RNAs and Endometrial Cancer.Genes · 2018Review
- Structural neuroimaging as clinical predictor: A review of machine learning applications.NeuroImage. Clinical · 2018Review
- Selected research articles from the 2016 International Workshop on Computational Network Biology: Modeling, Analysis, and Control (CNB-MAC).BMC bioinformatics · 2017Article
- Artificial intelligence: A rapid case for advancement in the personalization of Gynaecology/Obstetric and Mental Health care.Women's health (London, England)Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundMetastasis via pelvic and/or para-aortic lymph nodes is a major risk factor for endometrial cancer. Lymph-node resection ameliorates risk but is associated with significant co-morbidities. Incidence in patients with stage I disease is 4-22% but no mechanism exists to accurately predict it. Therefore, national guidelines for primary staging surgery include pelvic and para-aortic lymph node dissection for all patients whose tumor exceeds 2cm in diameter. We sought to identify a robust molecular signature that can accurately classify risk of lymph node metastasis in endometrial cancer patients. 86 tumors matched for age and race, and evenly distributed between lymph node-positive and lymph node-negative cases, were selected as a training cohort. Genomic micro-RNA expression was profiled for each sample to serve as the predictive feature matrix. An independent set of 28 tumor samples was collected and similarly characterized to serve as a test cohort.
resultsA feature selection algorithm was designed for applications where the number of samples is far smaller than the number of measured features per sample. A predictive miRNA expression signature was developed using this algorithm, which was then used to predict the metastatic status of the independent test cohort. A weighted classifier, using 18 micro-RNAs, achieved 100% accuracy on the training cohort. When applied to the testing cohort, the classifier correctly predicted 90% of node-positive cases, and 80% of node-negative cases (FDR = 6.25%).
conclusionResults indicate that the evaluation of the quantitative sparse-feature classifier proposed here in clinical trials may lead to significant improvement in the prediction of lymphatic metastases in endometrial cancer patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.