ArticleBMC bioinformatics2017
Prediction of virus-host infectious association by supervised learning methods.
Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
25 citing papers in PubMed, 50 citations in OpenAlex.
- Identifying host-specific patterns in viral protein sequences to predict host spillover risk in animal and plant kingdoms.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Review
- The effect of taxonomic, host-dependent features and sample bias on virus host prediction using machine learning and short sequence k-mers.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Evaluating machine learning approaches for host prediction using H3 influenza genomic data.PloS one · 2025Article
- A predictive approach for host-pathogen interactions using deep learning and protein sequences.Virusdisease · 2024Article
- Recent Applications of Artificial Intelligence in Discovery of New Antibacterial Agents.Advances and applications in bioinformatics and chemistry : AABC · 2024Review
- Leveraging machine learning to distinguish between bacterial and viral induced pharyngitis using hematological markers: a retrospective cohort study.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Using machine learning to detect coronaviruses potentially infectious to humans.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- GSPHI: A novel deep learning model for predicting phage-host interactions via multiple biological information.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2023Article
- Computational Tools for the Analysis of Uncultivated Phage Genomes.Microbiology and molecular biology reviews : MMBR · 2022Review
- RaFAH: Host prediction for viruses of Bacteria and Archaea based on protein content.Patterns (New York, N.Y.) · 2021Article
- Application of machine learning in bacteriophage research.BMC microbiology · 2021Review
- Reservoir hosts prediction for COVID-19 by hybrid transfer learning model.Journal of biomedical informatics · 2021Article
- Adsorption Sequencing as a Rapid Method to Link Environmental Bacteriophages to Hosts.iScience · 2020Article
- A network-based integrated framework for predicting virus-prokaryote interactions.NAR genomics and bioinformatics · 2020Article
- Predicting host taxonomic information from viral genomes: A comparison of feature representations.PLoS computational biology · 2020Article
- Beyond cells - The virome in the human holobiont.Microbial cell (Graz, Austria) · 2019Review
- The Role of Genetic Factors in Characterizing Extra-Intestinal Manifestations in Crohn's Disease Patients: Are Bayesian Machine Learning Methods Improving Outcome Predictions?Journal of clinical medicine · 2019Article
- Host Taxon Predictor - A Tool for Predicting Taxon of the Host of a Newly Discovered Virus.Scientific reports · 2019Article
- Phage puppet masters of the marine microbial realm.Nature microbiology · 2018Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe study of virus-host infectious association is important for understanding the functions and dynamics of microbial communities. Both cellular and fractionated viral metagenomic data generate a large number of viral contigs with missing host information. Although relative simple methods based on the similarity between the word frequency vectors of viruses and bacterial hosts have been developed to study virus-host associations, the problem is significantly understudied. We hypothesize that machine learning methods based on word frequencies can be efficiently used to study virus-host infectious associations.
methodsWe investigate four different representations of word frequencies of viral sequences including the relative word frequency and three normalized word frequencies by subtracting the number of expected from the observed word counts. We also study five machine learning methods including logistic regression, support vector machine, random forest, Gaussian naive Bayes and Bernoulli naive Bayes for separating infectious from non-infectious viruses for nine bacterial host genera with at least 45 infecting viruses. Area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) is used to compare the performance of different machine learning method and feature combinations. We then evaluate the performance of the best method for the identification of the hosts of contigs in metagenomic studies. We also develop a maximum likelihood method to estimate the fraction of true infectious viruses for a given host in viral tagging experiments.
resultsBased on nine bacterial host genera with at least 45 infectious viruses, we show that random forest together with the relative word frequency vector performs the best in identifying viruses infecting particular hosts. For all the nine host genera, the AUC is over 0.85 and for five of them, the AUC is higher than 0.98 when the word size is 6 indicating the high accuracy of using machine learning approaches for identifying viruses infecting particular hosts. We also show that our method can predict the hosts of viral contigs of length at least 1kbps in metagenomic studies with high accuracy. The random forest together with word frequency vector outperforms current available methods based on Manhattan and [Formula: see text] dissimilarity measures. Based on word frequencies, we estimate that about 95% of the identified T4-like viruses in viral tagging experiment infect Synechococcus, while only about 29% of the identified non-T4-like viruses and 30% of the contigs in the study potentially infect Synechococcus.
conclusionsThe random forest machine learning method together with the relative word frequencies as features of viruses can be used to predict viruses and viral contigs for specific bacterial hosts. The maximum likelihood approach can be used to estimate the fraction of true infectious associated viruses in viral tagging experiments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.