Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28361502›Full record

ReviewJournal of the International AIDS Society2017

Achieving pregnancy safely for HIV-serodiscordant couples: a social ecological approach.

Haneefa T Saleem, Manjulaa Narasimhan, Julie A Denison, Caitlin E Kennedy

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of the International AIDS Society, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. "Sexual and reproductive health matters · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. HIV-1 heterosexual transmission and association with sexually transmitted infections in the era of treatment as prevention.International journal of infectious diseases : IJID : official publication of the International Society for Infectious Diseases · 2019
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Haneefa T SaleemCenter for Global Health Engagement, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Rockville, MD, USA.
Manjulaa NarasimhanDepartment of Reproductive Health Research, (includes the UNDP/UNFPA/UNICEF/WHO/World Bank Special Programme - HRP), World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.
Julie A DenisonDepartment of International Health, Social and Behavioral Interventions Program, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Caitlin E KennedyDepartment of International Health, Social and Behavioral Interventions Program, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Johns Hopkins University · USUniformed Services University of the Health Sciences · USWorld Health Organization · CH

Funding

World Health Organization 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The recognition and fulfilment of the sexual and reproductive health and rights (SRHR) of all individuals and couples affected by HIV, including HIV-serodiscordant couples, requires intervention strategies aimed at achieving safe and healthy pregnancies and preventing undesired pregnancies. Reducing risk of horizontal and vertical transmission and addressing HIV-related infertility are key components of such interventions. In this commentary, we present challenges and opportunities for achieving safe pregnancies for serodiscordant couples through a social ecological lens. At the individual level, knowledge (e.g. of HIV status, assisted reproductive technologies) and skills (e.g. adhering to antiretroviral therapy or pre-exposure prophylaxis) are important. At the couple level, communication between partners around HIV status disclosure, fertility desires and safer pregnancy is required. Within the structural domain, social norms, stigma and discrimination from families, community and social networks influence individual and couple experiences. The availability and quality of safer conception and fertility support services within the healthcare system remains essential, including training for healthcare providers and strengthening integration of SRHR and HIV services. Policies, legislation and funding can improve access to SRHR services. A social ecological framework allows us to examine interactions between levels and how interventions at multiple levels can better support HIV-serodiscordant couples to achieve safe pregnancies. Strategies to achieve safer pregnancies should consider interrelated challenges at different levels of a social ecological framework. Interventions across multiple levels, implemented concurrently, have the potential to maximize impact and ensure the full SRHR of HIV-serodiscordant couples.

Indexed as

FertilizationReproductive Health ServicesAdultFamily CharacteristicsFemaleFertilityHealth PersonnelHIV InfectionsHumansInfectious Disease Transmission, VerticalMalePre-Exposure ProphylaxisPregnancyPregnancy Complications, InfectiousRisk Reduction BehaviorSexual BehaviorfertilityHIVreproductive healthSafer conceptionserodiscordant couplessocial ecological models

Identifiers

PMID28361502
PMCPMC5577721
OpenAlexW2599757501

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.