Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28361471›Full record

ArticlePsychological research2018

Perceiver as polar planimeter: Direct perception of jumping, reaching, and jump-reaching affordances for the self and others.

Brandon J Thomas, Matthew M Hawkins, Patrick Nalepka

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Psychological research, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. The psychophysics of remembered affordances.Psychological research · 2025
    Article
  3. Higher order affordances.Psychonomic bulletin & review · 2025
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Mood Influences the Perception of the Sitting Affordance.Attention, perception & psychophysics · 2022
    Article
  7. CanFrontiers in psychology · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Brandon J ThomasDepartment of Psychology, University of Utah, 380 S 1530 E Beh S 502, Salt Lake City, UT, 84112, USA. brandonjthomas47@gmail.com.
Matthew M HawkinsDepartment of Psychology, Center for Cognition, Action, and Perception, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, USA.
Patrick NalepkaDepartment of Psychology, Center for Cognition, Action, and Perception, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Runeson (Scandanavian Journal of Psychology 18:172-179, 1977) suggested that the polar planimeter might serve as an informative model system of perceptual mechanism. The key aspect of the polar planimeter is that it registers a higher order property of the environment without computational mediation on the basis of lower order properties, detecting task-specific information only. This aspect was posited as a hypothesis for the perception of jumping and reaching affordances for the self and another person. The findings supported this hypothesis. The perception of reaching while jumping significantly differed from an additive combination of jump-without-reaching and reach-without-jumping perception. The results are consistent with Gibson's (The senses considered as perceptual systems, Houghton Mifflin, Boston, MA; Gibson, The senses considered as perceptual systems, Houghton Mifflin, Boston, MA, 1966; The ecological approach to visual perception, Houghton Mifflin, Boston, MA; Gibson, The ecological approach to visual perception, Houghton Mifflin, Boston, MA, 1979) theory of information-that aspects of the environment are specified by patterns in energetic media.

Indexed as

FemaleHumansMaleMovementVisual PerceptionYoung AdultAction capabilitiesAffordancesContext-sensitivityDirect perception

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.