Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28361436›Full record

ArticlePsychonomic bulletin & review2017

The effect of character contextual diversity on eye movements in Chinese sentence reading.

Qingrong Chen, Guoxia Zhao, Xin Huang, Yiming Yang, Michael K Tanenhaus

Erratum issuedAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Psychonomic bulletin & review, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. CCLOOW: Chinese children's lexicon of oral words.Behavior research methods · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Qingrong ChenSchool of Psychology, Nanjing Normal University, Nanjing, China. jscqr80@sina.com.
Guoxia ZhaoSchool of Psychology, Nanjing Normal University, Nanjing, China.
Xin HuangSchool of Psychology, Nanjing Normal University, Nanjing, China.
Yiming YangSchool of Linguistic Sciences, Jiangsu Normal University, Jiangsu, China. yangym@jsnu.edu.cn.
Michael K TanenhausSchool of Psychology, Nanjing Normal University, Nanjing, China. mtanenha@ur.rochester.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Chen, Huang, et al. (Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 2017) found that when reading two-character Chinese words embedded in sentence contexts, contextual diversity (CD), a measure of the proportion of texts in which a word appears, affected fixation times to words. When CD is controlled, however, frequency did not affect reading times. Two experiments used the same experimental designs to examine whether there are frequency effects of the first character of two-character words when CD is controlled. In Experiment 1, yoked triples of characters from a control group, a group matched for character CD that is lower in frequency, and a group matched in frequency with the control group, but higher in character CD, were rotated through the same sentence frame. In Experiment 2 each character from a larger set was embedded in a separate sentence frame, allowing for a larger difference in log frequency compared to Experiment 1 (0.8 and 0.4, respectively). In both experiments, early and later eye movement measures were significantly shorter for characters with higher CD than for characters with lower CD, with no effects of character frequency. These results place constraints on models of visual word recognition and suggest ways in which Chinese can be used to tease apart the nature of context effects in word recognition and language processing in general.

Indexed as

Eye MovementsPattern Recognition, VisualReadingRecognition, PsychologyChinaHumansCharacter frequencyContextual diversityEye movementsReading

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.