Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28361260›Full record

ReviewLa Radiologia medica2017

Gadolinium retention in the body: what we know and what we can do.

Enrico Tedeschi, Ferdinando Caranci, Flavio Giordano, Valentina Angelini, Sirio Cocozza, Arturo Brunetti

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in La Radiologia medica, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 46 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
46citing papers in PubMed
5.4field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

46 citing papers in PubMed, 84 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Multimodal evaluation of the cerebrovascular reserve in Neurofibromatosis type 1 patients with Moyamoya syndrome.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2021
    Observational
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Enrico TedeschiNeuroradiology Unit, Department of Advanced Biomedical Sciences, University of Naples "Federico II", Via S. Pansini, 5-80131, Naples, Italy. enrico.tedeschi@unina.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0511-0132
Ferdinando CaranciDepartment of Medicine and Health Sciences, "Università del Molise", Campobasso, Italy.
Flavio GiordanoNeuroradiology Unit, Department of Advanced Biomedical Sciences, University of Naples "Federico II", Via S. Pansini, 5-80131, Naples, Italy.
Valentina AngeliniNeuroradiology Unit, Department of Advanced Biomedical Sciences, University of Naples "Federico II", Via S. Pansini, 5-80131, Naples, Italy.
Sirio CocozzaNeuroradiology Unit, Department of Advanced Biomedical Sciences, University of Naples "Federico II", Via S. Pansini, 5-80131, Naples, Italy.
Arturo BrunettiNeuroradiology Unit, Department of Advanced Biomedical Sciences, University of Naples "Federico II", Via S. Pansini, 5-80131, Naples, Italy.
University of Naples Federico II · ITFederico II University Hospital · ITUniversity of Molise · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Gadolinium-based contrast agents (GBCA), widely used in Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) for almost 30 years, were recently shown to be deposited in the brain and to induce persistent T1 shortening in deep gray matter structures in subjects with normal renal function. The aim of the present study is to summarize the evidence derived from the rapidly growing scientific literature on Gadolinium retention in the brain and in the rest of the body. To this end, the original articles that described imaging and pathology findings in humans and animals exposed to GBCA were reviewed. The main aspects that emerged were the different effects of linear and macrocyclic GBCA on brain MRI appearance, the evidence of Gadolinium tissue retention in multiple organs, and the debated issue of the possible clinical consequences. Although no adverse health effects have been documented so far, updated information about GBCA build-up in the body is necessary for health professionals, also in view of the increasing concern in the general population. To date, our knowledge about the mechanisms of Gadolinium tissue deposition and, above all, its long-term consequences is still largely incomplete. However, while official guidelines are eagerly awaited, some advices may already be given, to help our radiological daily practice.

Indexed as

Magnetic Resonance ImagingAnimalsBrainContrast MediaGadoliniumHumansImage EnhancementContrast MediaGadoliniumDentate nucleusGadolinium-based contrast mediaGadolinium retentionMRIToxicity

Identifiers

PMID28361260
OpenAlexW2600608168

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.