Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28361192›Full record

ReviewDer Orthopade2017

[Malalignment of the first ray : Clinical and radiological diagnostics].

M Walther

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Der Orthopade, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 44% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

M WaltherFachzentrum für Fuß und Sprunggelenkchirurgie, Schön Klinik München Harlaching, FIFA Medical Centre, Harlachinger Str. 51, 81547, München, Deutschland. mwalther@schoen-kliniken.de.
Schön Klinik München Harlaching · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Clinical and radiological examination of the foot are mandatory before surgical correction of the forefoot. The clinical examination includes leg axis, position of the hind foot, deformity of the first ray as well as skin conditions, pulse status and possible sensitive deficits. A shortening of the gastrocnemius muscle can be identified using the Silfverskiöld test. Discomfort in the midfoot can indicate pathologies of the tarsometatarsal joint and the same applies for osteophyte infiltration around the Lisfranc joint line, whereby the second tarsometatarsal joint often shows more advanced degenerative arthritis than the first tarsometatarsal joint. Callosities under the second and third metatarsal heads correlate with a faulty load transmission of the first ray. A limitation of the range of movement of the first metatarsophalangeal joint is usually associated with degenerative arthritis in X‑ray imaging. Under weight bearing, X‑rays of the foot in two planes represent the standard imaging examination. In addition to the intermetatarsal angle, the hallux valgus angle and the interphalangeal angle as well as the width of the first metatarsal bone influence the therapy decision. The same applies to degenerative changes or an obvious instability of the first tarsometatarsal joint. In many cases, initial signs of degenerative arthritis can be found in the metatarsophalangeal joint and around the sesamoid bones, although these often do not correlate to clinical symptoms.

Indexed as

Anatomic LandmarksDiagnosis, DifferentialEvidence-Based MedicineHallux ValgusHumansPainPhysical ExaminationTomography, X-Ray ComputedDiagnostic imagingHallux valgusMetatarsophalangeal jointsPhysical examinationWeight bearing

Identifiers

PMID28361192
OpenAlexW2600950030

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.