Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28361182›Full record

ArticleAnnals of biomedical engineering2017

Stiffness of Protease Sensitive and Cell Adhesive PEG Hydrogels Promotes Neovascularization In Vivo.

Ryan M Schweller, Zi Jun Wu, Bruce Klitzman, Jennifer L West

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of biomedical engineering, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 39 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Biofabrication and Characterization of Vascularizing PEG-Norbornene Microgels.Journal of biomedical materials research. Part A · 2025
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Microphysiological System Design: Simplicity Is Elegance.Current opinion in biomedical engineering · 2020
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Vascularization in tissue engineering: fundamentals and state-of-art.Progress in biomedical engineering (Bristol, England) · 2020
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ryan M SchwellerDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Duke University, Durham, NC, 27708, USA.
Zi Jun WuKenan Plastic Surgery Research Labs, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, 27710, USA.
Bruce KlitzmanDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Duke University, Durham, NC, 27708, USA.
Jennifer L WestDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Duke University, Durham, NC, 27708, USA. jennifer.l.west@duke.edu.
Duke University · US

Funding

Neurovascular RegenerationR01EB016629 · NIBIB · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI HIRSCHI, KAREN KEMPER · 2014 to 2018
$4.8M
Modulating Cell Phenotype during Tubulogenesis through 3D MicropatterningF32HL120650 · NHLBI · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI SCHWELLER, RYAN M · 2013 to 2015
$159k
NHLBI NIH HHS F32 HL120650NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB016629
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Materials that support the assembly of new vasculature are critical for regenerative medicine. Controlling the scaffold's mechanical properties may help to optimize neovascularization within implanted biomaterials. However, reducing the stiffness of synthetic hydrogels usually requires decreasing polymer densities or increasing chain lengths, both of which accelerate degradation. We synthesized enzymatically-degradable poly(ethylene glycol) hydrogels with compressive moduli from 2 to 18 kPa at constant polymer density, chain length, and proteolytic degradability by inserting an allyloxycarbonyl functionality into the polymer backbone. This group competes with acrylates during photopolymerization to alter the crosslink network structure and reduce the hydrogel's stiffness. Hydrogels that incorporated (soft) or lacked (stiff) this group were implanted subcutaneously in rats to investigate the role of stiffness on host tissue interactions. Changes in tissue integration were quantified after 4 weeks via the hydrogel area replaced by native tissue (tissue area fraction), yielding 0.136 for softer vs. 0.062 for stiffer hydrogels. Including soluble FGF-2 and PDGF-BB improved these responses to 0.164 and 0.089, respectively. Softer gels exhibited greater vascularization with 8.6 microvessels mm

Indexed as

AnimalsBiocompatible MaterialsCell AdhesionHydrogelsMaleNeovascularization, PhysiologicPeptide HydrolasesPeptidesPolyethylene GlycolsProstheses and ImplantsRats, Inbred LewTissue EngineeringBiocompatible MaterialsHydrogelsPeptide HydrolasesPeptidesPolyethylene GlycolsAngiogenesisEndothelial cellInflammationMechanical properties

Identifiers

PMID28361182
PMCPMC5426656
OpenAlexW2598580341

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.